[gmx-users] Non integer charge value
Justin Lemkul
jalemkul at vt.edu
Thu May 10 20:41:14 CEST 2018
On 5/10/18 8:57 AM, Hemalatha Jayabal wrote:
> The magnitude of the charge is 0.18 and I hope such magnitude cannot be
> ignored. Please find the topology of the protein chain(specific residue) in
> which the error is occuring
> [ atoms ]
> ; nr type resnr residue atom cgnr charge mass typeB
> chargeB massB
> ; residue 202 HYP rtp HYP q +0.2
> 1 NH2 202 HYP N 1 -0.96 14.007 ;
> qtot -0.96
> 2 H 202 HYP HT1 2 0.34 1.008 ;
> qtot -0.62
> 3 H 202 HYP HT2 3 0.34 1.008 ;
> qtot -0.28
What patching are you applying to the N-terminus? These charges are
totally wrong. Make sure to apply the PRO-NH2+ patch.
-Justin
> 4 CT1 202 HYP CA 4 0.19 12.011 ;
> qtot -0.09
> 5 HB 202 HYP HA 5 0.09 1.008 ;
> qtot 0
> 6 C 202 HYP C 6 0.51 12.011 ;
> qtot 0.51
> 7 O 202 HYP O 7 -0.51 15.999 ;
> qtot 0
> 8 CP2 202 HYP CB 8 -0.18 12.011 ;
> qtot -0.18
> 9 HA 202 HYP HB1 9 0.09 1.008 ;
> qtot -0.09
> 10 HA 202 HYP HB2 10 0.09 1.008 ;
> qtot 0
> 11 CP2 202 HYP CG 11 0.14 12.011 ;
> qtot 0.14
> 12 HA 202 HYP HG 12 0.09 1.008 ;
> qtot 0.23
> 13 CP3 202 HYP CD 13 0 12.011 ;
> qtot 0.23
> 14 HA 202 HYP HD21 14 0.09 1.008 ;
> qtot 0.32
> 15 HA 202 HYP HD22 15 0.09 1.008 ;
> qtot 0.41
> 16 OH1 202 HYP OD1 16 -0.66 15.999 ;
> qtot -0.25
> 17 H 202 HYP HD1 17 0.43 1.008 ;
> qtot 0.18
>
>
>
> On Thu 10 May, 2018, 18:07 Justin Lemkul, <jalemkul at vt.edu> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 5/10/18 8:29 AM, Hemalatha Jayabal wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I have added a non standard amino acid 'Hydroxyproline' to my forcefield
>>> (from literature) Charmm27 and after using pdb2gmx i could see that the
>>> system has a non integer charge value for 1 protein chain out of 3
>> protein
>>> chains. (All 3 chains contain the non standard amino acid)
>>> The problem is occuring in the chain in which the terminal residue is
>> this
>>> hydroxyproline. (All other places where the 'HYP' residue appears, the
>>> charge is 0). I tried using different terminii just to be sure that the
>>> problem is not because of the terminii.
>>>
>>> What should be done in such a case?
>> That depends on if the magnitude of the charge is meaningful or not. If
>> you have two "correct" chains and one "incorrect" chain, that suggests
>> that nothing is likely wrong with your HYP residue so things should be
>> fine, but refer to
>> http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Floating_Point_Arithmetic to be
>> sure. The current version of GROMACS (2018.1) handles these rounding
>> issues better to trigger fewer false warnings.
>>
>> -Justin
>>
>> --
>> ==================================================
>>
>> Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
>> Assistant Professor
>> Virginia Tech Department of Biochemistry
>>
>> 303 Engel Hall
>> 340 West Campus Dr.
>> Blacksburg, VA 24061
>>
>> jalemkul at vt.edu | (540) 231-3129
>> http://www.thelemkullab.com
>>
>> ==================================================
>>
>> --
>> Gromacs Users mailing list
>>
>> * Please search the archive at
>> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
>> posting!
>>
>> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>>
>> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
>> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
>> send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>>
--
==================================================
Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
Virginia Tech Department of Biochemistry
303 Engel Hall
340 West Campus Dr.
Blacksburg, VA 24061
jalemkul at vt.edu | (540) 231-3129
http://www.thelemkullab.com
==================================================
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list