[gmx-users] Colchicine topology

[Alex]

Mark, please don't be one of those people telling young researchers that 
everything has already been done. :)

My postdoc (a fellow, actually -- with her own project & funding) is 
reading all these horrible papers and, according to her, everything has 
been done. Drives me nuts!

Alex


On 5/28/2018 1:11 AM, Mark Abraham wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found a couple of papers doing MD on colchicine and tubulin in a few
> minutes on Google - maybe you should start there and also check your work
> will be novel :-)
>
> Mark
>
> On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 8:00 AM Harutyun Sahakyan <sahakyanhk at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>>
>>
>> I use gromacs for MD simulations, but use charmm or amber force fields, did
>> someone try to generate the colchicine topology? I try to do it using
>> CGenFF, but get to high penalty score due to dihedrals. And which force
>> field is better for protein-ligand simulation (tubulin-colchicine)?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thank you in advance,
>>
>> Harut
>> --
>> Gromacs Users mailing list
>>
>> * Please search the archive at
>> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
>> posting!
>>
>> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>>
>> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
>> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
>> send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>>