[gmx-users] About rlist, rvdw
高恺
gaokai161 at mails.ucas.ac.cn
Mon Oct 8 14:43:07 CEST 2018
Dear gromacs users,
I have recently done some simulations of CH4-Graphite desorption. I put methane into the graphite pores, and the pores are connected to the outside by a channel, allowing methane to spontaneously desorb because of the pressure difference and finally reach equilibrium.
This is a simple simulation, but I noticed that using different rlist, rvdw values, the density of methane in the hole will be significantly different after the system is equilibrated.
In my understanding, the larger the rlist/rvdw, the closer the simulation results are to the real world. But I don't understand why rlist/rvdw has such a big impact on simulation results. If the result of setting rlist=2 is significantly different from the result of setting rlist=1, does it mean that the result of setting rlist to 1 is not trusted?
I am using following parameters (mdp file):
------------------------------------------------------
; Run parameters
integrator = md
nsteps = 20000000
dt = 0.001
comm-mode = None
; Output control
nstxout = 50000
nstvout = 50000
nstfout = 50000
nstlog = 50000
nstenergy = 50000
nstxtcout = 1000
xtc_precision = 10000
energygrps = GRA GAS
; Neighborsearching
ns_type = grid
nstlist = 5
rlist = 1
; VDW
vdw-type = cut-off
rvdw = 1
; OPTIONS FOR ELECTROSTATICS
coulombtype =cut-off
rcoulomb = 1
; Periodic boundary conditions
pbc = xyz
; TEMPERATURE COUPLING
Tcoupl = nose-hoover
tc_grps = GRA GAS
tau_t = 2 2
ref_t = 400 400
; VELOCITIES GENERATION
gen_vel = yes
gen_temp = 400
gen_seed = 391482
; ENERGY GROUP EXCLUSIONS
energygrp_excl = GRA GRA
; Other Settings
freezegrps = GRA
freezedim = Y Y Y
-------------------------------------------------------------------
I would be very grateful if anyone can help me.
Kevin
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list