[gmx-users] Make check not passing tests on 2018.5
David Lister
me at davidlister.ca
Fri Feb 15 18:19:23 CET 2019
That's quite interesting, I wonder what it is about my system that is
causing the issue. If it means anything, this is on a fresh install of
Ubuntu 18.04.
I've had a chance to experiment with compilers on my system. GCC 8.2.0
passes with avx-512. Using a freshly compiled version of GCC 7.3.0 and
tried it, but it showed the same behavior as before: failing make check
with avx-512 and passing with avx2-256.
Cheers,
David
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 7:53 AM Szilárd Páll <pall.szilard at gmail.com> wrote:
> Forgot to get back, but same here, I checked on a Core i9 with gcc 7.3
> (compiled from source though) and could not reproduce it.
> --
> Szilárd
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 6:36 PM Schulz, Roland <roland.schulz at intel.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I can't reproduce this. For me the regressiontests pass with gcc 7.3,
> > AVX_512, double.
> >
> > Roland
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: gromacs.org_gmx-users-bounces at maillist.sys.kth.se
> > > [mailto:gromacs.org_gmx-users-bounces at maillist.sys.kth.se] On Behalf
> Of
> > > David Lister
> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2019 4:59 PM
> > > To: gmx-users at gromacs.org
> > > Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Make check not passing tests on 2018.5
> > >
> > > I have yet to have a chance to test a different compiler. The AVX_512
> is
> > > reproducible and showed the same error in 3 tests.
> > >
> > > I hope to check gcc 8 later this week.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > David
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 6:15 PM Szilárd Páll <pall.szilard at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > What about the other checks I suggested? IS the failing test 100%
> > > > reproducible with AVX_512?
> > > > --
> > > > Szilárd
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 9:15 PM David Lister <me at davidlister.ca>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > >
> > > > > My bad, I copied my single precision build by mistake, this is what
> > > > > was used originally for double precision:
> > > > >
> > > > > cmake .. -DREGRESSIONTEST_DOWNLOAD=ON -
> > > DGMX_BUILD_OWN_FFTW=ON
> > > > > -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DGMX_BUILD_UNITTESTS=ON
> > > > > -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr/local/gromacs-2018.5 -
> > > DGMX_DOUBLE=on
> > > > >
> > > > > Adding -DGMX_SIMD=AVX2_256 did resolve the problem, thank-you for
> > > > > the
> > > > help!
> > > > > I did not test different compilers as I don't have any others on my
> > > > system
> > > > > at the moment.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > David
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 7:15 AM Szilárd Páll <
> pall.szilard at gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 5:01 AM David Lister <me at davidlister.ca>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I've compiled gromacs 2018.5 in double precision a couple times
> > > > > > > now
> > > > and
> > > > > > it
> > > > > > > keeps on failing the same tests every time. This is on Ubuntu
> > > > > > > 18.04
> > > > with
> > > > > > an
> > > > > > > i9 7900X.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The cmake I used was:
> > > > > > > cmake .. -DREGRESSIONTEST_DOWNLOAD=ON -DGMX_GPU=on
> > > > > > -DGMX_BUILD_OWN_FFTW=ON
> > > > > > > -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DGMX_BUILD_UNITTESTS=ON
> > > > > > > -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr/local/gromacs-2018.5
> > > > > >
> > > > > > That couldn't have been the cmake invocation as it's not double
> > > > > > precision build (and -DGMX_GPU=on is not valid in a double
> > > > > > precision build).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The problem with make check is:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 34/39 Test #34: regressiontests/simple ........... Passed
> > 3.01
> > > > sec
> > > > > > > Start 35: regressiontests/complex
> > > > > > > 35/39 Test #35: regressiontests/complex ..........***Failed
> > 34.69
> > > > sec
> > > > > > > Will test using executable suffix _d
> > > > > > > :-) GROMACS - gmx mdrun, 2018.5 (double precision)
> > (-:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > GROMACS is written by:
> > > > > > > Emile Apol Rossen Apostolov Paul Bauer
> Herman
> > J.C.
> > > > > > Berendsen
> > > > > > > Par Bjelkmar Aldert van Buuren Rudi van Drunen
> Anton
> > > > > > Feenstra
> > > > > > > Gerrit Groenhof Aleksei Iupinov Christoph Junghans
> Anca
> > > > Hamuraru
> > > > > > > Vincent Hindriksen Dimitrios Karkoulis Peter Kasson
> > Jiri
> > > > Kraus
> > > > > > > Carsten Kutzner Per Larsson Justin A. Lemkul
> > Viveca
> > > > > > Lindahl
> > > > > > > Magnus Lundborg Pieter Meulenhoff Erik Marklund
> Teemu
> > > > Murtola
> > > > > > > Szilard Pall Sander Pronk Roland Schulz
> Alexey
> > > > > > Shvetsov
> > > > > > > Michael Shirts Alfons Sijbers Peter Tieleman
> Teemu
> > > > > > Virolainen
> > > > > > > Christian Wennberg Maarten Wolf
> > > > > > > and the project leaders:
> > > > > > > Mark Abraham, Berk Hess, Erik Lindahl, and David van
> der
> > > > Spoel
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Copyright (c) 1991-2000, University of Groningen, The
> > Netherlands.
> > > > > > > Copyright (c) 2001-2017, The GROMACS development team at
> > > Uppsala
> > > > > > > University, Stockholm University and the Royal Institute of
> > > > > > > Technology, Sweden.
> > > > > > > check out http://www.gromacs.org for more information.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > GROMACS is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> > > > > > > it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public License as
> > > > > > > published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2.1
> of
> > > > > > > the License, or (at your option) any later version.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > GROMACS: gmx mdrun, version 2018.5 (double precision)
> > > > > > > Executable: /home/david/gromacs-2018.5/build/bin/gmx_d
> > > > > > > Data prefix: /home/david/gromacs-2018.5 (source tree) Working
> > > > > > > dir:
> > > > > > /home/david/gromacs-2018.5/build/tests/regressiontests-2018.5
> > > > > > > Command line:
> > > > > > > gmx_d mdrun -h
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanx for Using GROMACS - Have a Nice Day
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Mdrun cannot use the requested (or automatic) number of ranks,
> > > > retrying
> > > > > > with 8.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Abnormal return value for ' gmx_d mdrun -nb cpu -notunepme
> > > > > > > >mdrun.out 2>&1' was 1
> > > > > > > Retrying mdrun with better settings...
> > > > > > > Mdrun cannot use the requested (or automatic) number of ranks,
> > > > retrying
> > > > > > with 8.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Abnormal return value for ' gmx_d mdrun -nb cpu -notunepme
> > > > > > > >mdrun.out 2>&1' was 1
> > > > > > > Retrying mdrun with better settings...
> > > > > > > FAILED. Check checkpot.out (69 errors), checkforce.out (224
> > > > > > > errors)
> > > > > > > file(s) in distance_restraints for distance_restraints Mdrun
> > > > > > > cannot use the requested (or automatic) number of ranks,
> > > > retrying
> > > > > > with 8.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Abnormal return value for ' gmx_d mdrun -nb cpu -notunepme
> > > > > > > >mdrun.out 2>&1' was 1
> > > > > > > Retrying mdrun with better settings...
> > > > > > > Mdrun cannot use the requested (or automatic) number of ranks,
> > > > retrying
> > > > > > with 8.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Abnormal return value for ' gmx_d mdrun -
> > > notunepme >mdrun.out
> > > > > > 2>&1' was 1
> > > > > > > Retrying mdrun with better settings...
> > > > > > > Mdrun cannot use the requested (or automatic) number of ranks,
> > > > retrying
> > > > > > with 8.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Abnormal return value for ' gmx_d mdrun -
> > > notunepme >mdrun.out
> > > > > > 2>&1' was 1
> > > > > > > Retrying mdrun with better settings...
> > > > > > > FAILED. Check checkpot.out (16 errors), checkforce.out (1362
> > > > > > > errors)
> > > > > > > file(s) in orientation-restraints for orientation-restraints
> > > > > > > 2 out of 51 complex tests FAILED
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Start 36: regressiontests/kernel
> > > > > > > 36/39 Test #36: regressiontests/kernel ........... Passed
> > 55.12
> > > > sec
> > > > > > > Start 37: regressiontests/freeenergy
> > > > > > > 37/39 Test #37: regressiontests/freeenergy ....... Passed
> > 9.27
> > > > sec
> > > > > > > Start 38: regressiontests/pdb2gmx
> > > > > > > 38/39 Test #38: regressiontests/pdb2gmx .......... Passed
> > 16.95
> > > > sec
> > > > > > > Start 39: regressiontests/rotation
> > > > > > > 39/39 Test #39: regressiontests/rotation ......... Passed
> > 3.60
> > > > sec
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 97% tests passed, 1 tests failed out of 39
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Label Time Summary:
> > > > > > > GTest = 4.54 sec*proc (33 tests)
> > > > > > > IntegrationTest = 2.03 sec*proc (3 tests)
> > > > > > > MpiTest = 0.20 sec*proc (3 tests)
> > > > > > > UnitTest = 2.51 sec*proc (30 tests)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Total Test time (real) = 127.19 sec
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The following tests FAILED:
> > > > > > > 35 - regressiontests/complex (Failed) Errors while
> > > > > > > running CTest
> > > > > > > CMakeFiles/run-ctest-nophys.dir/build.make:57: recipe for
> target
> > > > > > > 'CMakeFiles/run-ctest-nophys' failed
> > > > > > > make[3]: *** [CMakeFiles/run-ctest-nophys] Error 8
> > > > > > > CMakeFiles/Makefile2:1385: recipe for target
> > > > > > > 'CMakeFiles/run-ctest-nophys.dir/all' failed
> > > > > > > make[2]: *** [CMakeFiles/run-ctest-nophys.dir/all] Error 2
> > > > > > > CMakeFiles/Makefile2:1165: recipe for target
> > > > 'CMakeFiles/check.dir/rule'
> > > > > > failed
> > > > > > > make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/check.dir/rule] Error 2
> > > > > > > Makefile:626: recipe for target 'check' failed
> > > > > > > make: *** [check] Error 2
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Looking at the log file for the orientation-restraints test
> > > > > > > shows different energies calculated for some terms. The
> > > > > > > different terms are bolded, but if that doesn't carry the LJ,
> > > > > > > Coulomb, Potential,
> > > > Kinetic,
> > > > > > > Total, Conserved, Temperature, Pressure and Constr rmsd are all
> > > > > > > different. In most cases significantly.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Looks like the short-range forces are quite a bit off. I can not
> > > > > > reproduce the issue on similar hardware (although with vanilla
> gcc
> > > > > > 7.3).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Can you please do a few tests which might give a hint where the
> > > > > > issue
> > > > is:
> > > > > > - see if the error is reproducible across multiple runs
> > > > > > - try with -DGMX_SIMD=AVX2_256
> > > > > > - try a different compiler (e.g. gcc 8 or clang)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Szilárd
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > From reference_d.log:
> > > > > > > Energies (kJ/mol)
> > > > > > > Bond U-B Proper Dih. Improper Dih.
> > > > CMAP
> > > > > > Dih.
> > > > > > > 8.49937e+02 2.39137e+03 1.86371e+03 1.57563e+02
> > > > > > -3.65191e+02
> > > > > > > LJ-14 Coulomb-14 LJ (SR) Coulomb (SR)
> > Coul.
> > > > > > recip.
> > > > > > > 9.32112e+02 1.40820e+04 -*1.21790e+03*
> *-2.01406e+04*
> > > > > > 4.96236e+01
> > > > > > > Orient. Rest. Ori. R. RMSD Potential Kinetic En.
> > Total
> > > > > > Energy
> > > > > > > 2.68612e+00 1.95988e+00 *-1.39474e+03*
> *3.19608e+03*
> > > > > > > *1.80134e+03*
> > > > > > > Conserved En. Temperature Pressure (bar) Constr. rmsd
> > > > > > > *1.80134e+03* *3.03394e+02* *-4.01423e+01*
> > *6.77807e-09*
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > And from my system:
> > > > > > > Energies (kJ/mol)
> > > > > > > Bond U-B Proper Dih. Improper Dih.
> > > > CMAP
> > > > > > Dih.
> > > > > > > 8.49937e+02 2.39137e+03 1.86371e+03 1.57563e+02
> > > > > > -3.65191e+02
> > > > > > > LJ-14 Coulomb-14 LJ (SR) Coulomb (SR)
> > Coul.
> > > > > > recip.
> > > > > > > 9.32112e+02 1.40820e+04 *-3.34280e+02 -3.70272e+03*
> > > > > > 4.96236e+01
> > > > > > > Orient. Rest. Ori. R. RMSD Potential Kinetic En.
> > Total
> > > > > > Energy
> > > > > > > 2.68612e+00 1.95988e+00 *1.59268e+04 3.21311e+03*
> > > > > > *1.91399e+04*
> > > > > > > Conserved En. Temperature Pressure (bar) Constr. rmsd
> > > > > > > *1.91399e+04 3.05010e+02 1.11267e+02 7.18413e-09*
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Any help on how resolve this would be greatly appreciated.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > David
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Gromacs Users mailing list
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > * Please search the archive at
> > > > > > http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List
> > > before
> > > > > > posting!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > * Can't post? Read
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> > > > > > >
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-use
> > > > > > > rs
> > > > or
> > > > > > send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Gromacs Users mailing list
> > > > > >
> > > > > > * Please search the archive at
> > > > > > http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List
> > > before
> > > > > > posting!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> > > > > >
> > > > > > * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> > > > > >
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users
> > > > > > or send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> > > > > --
> > > > > Gromacs Users mailing list
> > > > >
> > > > > * Please search the archive at
> > > > http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> > > > posting!
> > > > >
> > > > > * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> > > > >
> > > > > * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> > > > > https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users
> > > > > or
> > > > send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> > > > --
> > > > Gromacs Users mailing list
> > > >
> > > > * Please search the archive at
> > > > http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> > > > posting!
> > > >
> > > > * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> > > >
> > > > * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> > > > https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users
> or
> > > > send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> > > --
> > > Gromacs Users mailing list
> > >
> > > * Please search the archive at
> > > http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> > > posting!
> > >
> > > * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> > >
> > > * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> > > https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> > send
> > > a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> > --
> > Gromacs Users mailing list
> >
> > * Please search the archive at
> > http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> > posting!
> >
> > * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> >
> > * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> > https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> > send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> --
> Gromacs Users mailing list
>
> * Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> posting!
>
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list