[gmx-users] Reg LAM version to use

[raja]

Dear Mr.Yang Ye,

Thanks for your reply and suggestion. I am really felt sorry for hurting
you.
I am aware of your hard work and continuous patronage of all users
through this mailing list.  Experts like you being there is absolutely
necessary for peoples like me to master in this tool. 

Once again I put forward my real problem. As I want to run MD for the
protein of many variant types (mutant models) , It is absolutely needed
a high performance , I do have SGI machine but I am unable to compile in
it. Regarding which I posted a week back in mailing list
(http://www.gromacs.org/pipermail/gmx-users/2006-April/020969.html)
still this is unanswered. So now I am planning for MPI option in windows
(Cygwin). 

I request you that if you cannot provide solution for my compilation
problem in SGI, kindly provide me the executables of GROMACS3.3.1 or
GROMACS3.3 for SGI IRIX6.5.


With thanks!
B.Nataraj





On Sat, 15 Apr 2006 15:28:51 +0800, "Yang Ye"
<leafyoung81-group at yahoo.com> said:
> raja wrote:
> > Dear Mr.Yang Ye,
> >      I asked this question since I want to save some time, and use those
> >      time for my real research in gromacs. 
> > I already installed the latest version of LAM in cygwin. I am having
> > problem in lambooting , which I am trying to resolve using LAM user
> > list. In that juncture I dont want to have version incompatiability with
> > gromacs3.3.1 when everything get smooth with LAM.
> >
> > You see, I am dedicating more time for these installation and
> > configuring issues rather than really doing any research in my MD.
> > Please give me proper answer.
> >   
> Hi, Raja
> 
> If you would like to mention about "time", sorry to say that your mail 
> is "wasting" many people's time on this list. We are just offering our 
> advices with the limit of our experience.
> 
> If the mail is about something we did before, we are kind to answer it. 
> If the mail is about some thing we never tried, we may spend time in 
> paying our time and resources in looking it up. This is how many mailing 
> list works. The mailing list relies on everyone's input from his 
> experience. If you go ahead to try LAM on cygwin with GROMACS, you are 
> most welcomed to contribute your experience here.
> 
> Also, research work is not only about getting the result. System 
> building is also part of the training. The different proportion of 
> "Introduction", "Methodology", "Results" in a paper is a good indicator 
> for the work you shall allocate.
> 
> To con't from my last mail, I would like to add this: GROMACS is not 
> sensitive to LAM version while LAM on cygwin is another story.
> 
> Yang Ye
> 
> > With regards ,
> > B.Nataraj
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 15 Apr 2006 14:09:10 +0800, "Yang Ye"
> > <leafyoung81-group at yahoo.com> said:
> >   
> >> raja wrote:
> >>     
> >>> Hi All,
> >>>     In GROMACS website, it is explicitly stated that LAM-7.0.6-5 as the
> >>>     version for MPI option. Should I stick on the version of lam stated
> >>>     in gromacs webpage or can I use the latest version of LAM-7.1.2.
> >>>     Will it make any difference for MPI enabled gromacs-3.3.1 ?
> >>>
> >>> With thanks!
> >>> B.Nataraj
> >>>   
> >>>       
> >> try and you know.
> >>
> >> Yang Ye
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users at gromacs.org
> >> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> >> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
> >> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> >> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
> >>     
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users at gromacs.org
> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
-- 
  raja
  raja_28 at fastmail.us

-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - Does exactly what it says on the tin