[gmx-users] internal consistency warning in grompp not repeated at end of stderr output

[Chris Neale]

>this actually seems to be a message from cpp, therefore it is not 
>counted in the normal warning system. Unless we implement our own 
>baby-cpp it will be quite tedious to catch the warnings and error 
>messages from it.

That makes sense. Thanks for the advice. In any event I should get back into the habit of scanning the entire output from grompp instead of just the tail.