[gmx-users] Anisotropic Pressure
Berk Hess
gmx3 at hotmail.com
Sat Jun 16 10:09:26 CEST 2007
>From: Matteo Guglielmi <matteo.guglielmi at epfl.ch>
>Reply-To: Discussion list for GROMACS users <gmx-users at gromacs.org>
>To: GMX-LIST <gmx-users at gromacs.org>
>Subject: [gmx-users] Anisotropic Pressure
>Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 19:11:50 +0200
>
>Hello Folks,
>
>Is there any difference between these two anisotropic pressure setup?
>
>### 1st setup ###
>
>pcoupl = berendsen
>pcoupltype = anisotropic
>tau_p = 5.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
>compressibility = 4.53e-5 4.53e-5 4.53e-5 0.0 0.0 0.0
>ref_p = 1.025 1.025 1.025 0.0 0.0 0.0
>
>
>### 2nd setup ###
>
>pcoupl = berendsen
>pcoupltype = anisotropic
>tau_p = 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
>compressibility = 4.53e-5 4.53e-5 4.53e-5 0.0 0.0 0.0
>ref_p = 1.025 1.025 1.025 1.025 1.025 1.025
>
If the compressibility is zero, the corresponding unit-cell degree of
freedom
will not change, so effectively there is no difference.
>
>Which one would you suggest for anisotropic coupling (solvated pore
>immersed into a membrane)
Neither, you should probably use surface-tension coupling.
Berk.
_________________________________________________________________
FREE pop-up blocking with the new Windows Live Toolbar - get it now!
http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list