[gmx-users] Atom names mismatch
George Abadir
georgea at ece.ubc.ca
Fri May 30 07:57:27 CEST 2008
I am aslo using the ffamber port to GROMACS is this helps.
Thank you very much,
Regards,
George
George Abadir wrote:
> Thanks for your reply. I built the molecule using PYMOL, then used
> pdb2gmx to generate the topology. It seems that pdb2gmx reorders the
> atoms. Then in the simulation I used the initial PDB file generated by
> PYMOL. Does this make things any more reasonable. Because actually,
> this happened in five different simulations till now!!!! So, I don't
> think it is a mere coincidence. The molecule at the end is intact and
> all the atoms are in their respective positions (i.e., the carbon was
> not actually exchanged with hydrogen as it should be from the
> warning). It would very helpful if someone could see how these
> simulations continued without deforming the molecule.
> Thank you very much,
> Regards,
> George
>
> Mark Abraham wrote:
>
>> George Abadir wrote:
>>
>>> Thank you very much for your reply. Actually I ran the whole
>>> simulations (1000000 time steps), and the system did not crash. The
>>> molecule still
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm extremely surprised. Perhaps bond constrains on all atoms were
>> your friends here. :-) Nonetheless, it seems likely from the
>> mismatches that some incorrect van der Waals models were applied.
>>
>>> has the structure of phenylalanine. Does this mean that the final
>>> coordinates are ok, or should I redo the simulation again after
>>> resorting the atoms.
>>
>>
>>
>> Without understanding the reason for the mismatch, you can't say the
>> simulation is OK with certainty. It looks like the phenylalanine
>> structure you generated for the simulation ordered its atoms
>> differently from the one you used to generate its topology. If you go
>> and re-order the atoms in the structure file according to the
>> topology file, you should see these warnings go away, and now you can
>> be confident a resulting simulation is OK. I wouldn't trust the first
>> one, though.
>>
>> Mark
>> _______________________________________________
>> gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
>> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
>> Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before
>> posting!
>> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www
>> interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before
> posting!
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www
> interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
>
>
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list