[gmx-users] Current status of CMAP

[Mark Abraham]

Jakob Wohlert wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I know this has been up on the list before, but I haven't been able to 
> get some definite answer - What's the current status of the 
> implementation of CHARMM-type CMAPs? I note that people (especially P. 
> Bjelkmar as it seems) have done a great job implementing the other 
> peculiarities of the CHARMM force fields, but it's still that final 
> piece missing. There are several references to CMAP in the source code, 
> but I guess it's not fully implemented yet. I just wonder if it will be 
> ready anytime soon?
> 
> I would be glad to help anyway I can, at least by doing some testing.

You might be best served emailing Par, who I don't think subscribes to 
this list. We had a useful discussion on what I thought was a problem 
with the CHARMM implementation a little while back (it wasn't a problem).

Mark