[gmx-users] Current status of CMAP

[Jakob Wohlert]

> Jakob Wohlert wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I know this has been up on the list before, but I haven't been able to
>> get some definite answer - What's the current status of the
>> implementation of CHARMM-type CMAPs? I note that people (especially P.
>> Bjelkmar as it seems) have done a great job implementing the other
>> peculiarities of the CHARMM force fields, but it's still that final
>> piece missing. There are several references to CMAP in the source code,
>> but I guess it's not fully implemented yet. I just wonder if it will be
>> ready anytime soon?
>>
>> I would be glad to help anyway I can, at least by doing some testing.
>
> You might be best served emailing Par, who I don't think subscribes to
> this list. We had a useful discussion on what I thought was a problem
> with the CHARMM implementation a little while back (it wasn't a problem).
>
> Mark

Ok, thanks. I'll do that!

/Jakob



___________________________________________
> gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users at gromacs.org
> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
>