[gmx-users] where is the gromacs 4.0.6/7 revision list?

[chris.neale at utoronto.ca]

Thanks again Mark,

are you able to provide a bug number for "Fixed bug with pull groups  
using weights in parallel" so that I can figure out exactly what the  
problem was?

Separately, it seems like a decent idea to automate the production of  
this list and its update on the website whenever a new version is  
released... if that's even possible. I know that the tools section of  
the gromacs manual is autogenerated from the tool -h output, so that  
might be one route to make this happen.

Thank you,
Chris.

> Subject: Re: [gmx-users] where is the gromacs 4.0.6/7 revision list?
> To: Discussion list for GROMACS users <gmx-users at gromacs.org>
> Message-ID: <4B243D38.1000606 at anu.edu.au>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> chris.neale at utoronto.ca wrote:
>> Thanks for taking the time Mark, this is quite useful. Especially "Bug
>> 354: switching from Berendsen to V-rescale doesn't work if -nosum is
>> used" for those of us who don't follow the list every day.
>
> Yes, I thought that bug might be of more than minor interest to some people.
>
> I've done an extensive update to the 4.0.7 revision list here
> http://www.gromacs.org/About_Gromacs/Release_Notes/Revisions_in_4.0
> based on the git commit comments. Git made life really easy to get a
> list of the relevant commits with a diff nearby, so where the comment
> was cryptic and I either knew about the issue or could infer from the
> code changes, I clarified and expanded.
>
> People who've committed to release-4-0-patches this year should
> definitely cast their eye over the list to check my work.
>
> Justin, I wasn't sure to which commit your previous "constraints =
> h-angles" referred, so I left it at the bottom of the list. Please edit
> accordingly.
>
> Mark
>
>> -- original messagwe --
>>
>> I started a 4.0.7 revisions list there and noted the issues that came to
>> mind. The canonical source for such a list should be the git commits
>> here
>> http://repo.or.cz/w/gromacs.git/shortlog/refs/heads/release-4-0-patches,
>> but these are often cryptic and need re-writing for a revisions list
>> useful to non-developers. When I have some more time I'll put more
>> revisions up, but others should make an effort for things they've fixed...
>>
>> Mark
>>
>>
>>
>