[gmx-users] PULLING
Алексей Раевский
rayevsky85 at gmail.com
Sun Nov 15 18:00:10 CET 2009
Hi all.
I have to reproduce an experiment from the article "Identification of the
nucleophilic factors and the productive complex for the editing reaction by
leucyl-tRNA synthetase" (by Yohsuke Hagiwara a,b, Osamu Nureki c, Masaru
Tateno a,b,*). This is one of the steps of education I have to complete. All
actions described in this article were made with Amber9. I'm a newer in
modelling and I have only gromacs tools (v4.0.4), so I have downloaded amber
force field port-files (E.J. Sorin, S. Park). I want to know whether my mdp
files are reflexing the data I need. So this is a chapter from article:
"...1. MD simulations were performed using the AMBER 9 program. The parm99
force field was applied to the atoms of LeuRS and tRNALeu, and the TIP3P
model was used for the solvent water molecules. Electrostatic interactions
were calculated by the particle-mesh Ewald (PME) method, using 1.0 as the
dielectric constant. A cut-off of 12 Е was used to calculate the direct
space sum for PME; the electrostatic interactions beyond 12 Е were
calculated in reciprocal space by the fast Fourier transform method.
Thus, all electrostatic interactions between atoms were calculated. The
SHAKE algorithm was used to restrain the bond lengths involving hydrogen
atoms. The time step for integration was set to 1 fs. The temperature and
pres-sure were set using the Berendsen algorithm.
The initial coordinates used for the present MD simulations were from the
modelled structure previously constructed for LeuRS complexed with
valyl-tRNALeu. For the present system, we immersed the complex in a solvent
box comprising 49 587 water molecules, and used the periodic boundary
condition where the size of the unit box was 103.0 _ 138.3 _ 117.1 Е3. The
total number of atoms in the system was 165 739. In the initial (relaxation)
phase of the MD simulation, the water molecules were relaxed at 300 K for 10
ps, while the atoms of the protein and tRNALeu were positionally constrained
by a harmonic function using a force constant of 500 kcal/mol Е2. The force
constant was then reduced to 250, 125, 50, 25, 10, and 5 kcal/mol Е2 in six
MD simulations. The time consumed by each simulation was 2 ps...(then free
MD)...
2. This equilibrated system was used for further structural modeling to
investigate the hydrated structure relevant to the editing reaction, in
which 1 ns MD simulations were performed in the presence of constraints to
effectively explore the states. First, with respect to the atomic distance
between the carbonyl carbon of the substrate and the oxygen atom of the
identified nucleophilic water, a constrained MD simulation was performed to
investigate the
mechanisms of the approach of the water molecule. This simulation was
started by using a harmonic potential as the distance constraint, where the
force constant was set to 5 kcal/mol Е2. When the atomic distance was not
reduced any further, despite the presence of the harmonic potential in the
MD simulation (at about 470 ps), the force constant was increased up to 200
kcal/mol Е2; this was exploited to mimic the first phase of a nucleophilic
attack in the MD simulations, which enabled us to explore larger
conformational spaces than with the first principles MD simulations. A
similar protocol was applied in other constrained MD simulations for
efficient explorations of conformational spaces. To obtain a PMF with
respect to the rotation of the dihedral angle, C40-C30-O30-HO30 , we
employed the umbrella sampling technique, using 14 windows in the range of
50-180_. Umbrella sampling is a theoretical technique to efficiently search
for not only energetically favourable but also energetically-unfavourable
conformations in a phase space of a system, combined with a bias potential
(e.g. a harmonic potential) to overcome energy barriers. The force constants
of the potential in those windows were set to 10.0 kcal/mol rad2.
The structures obtained using MD simulations were evaluated by exploiting
quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM) hybrid calculations in terms
of the stability and reactivity. For this purpose, our interface program was
used to connect QM (gamess) andMM(amber) engines..."
Questions:
1.First of all, can I use spc instead op tip3p? Some problems occured when I
tried to full the genbox with water... not enough memory (it's not true, I
made my box corresponding to the values mentioned above).
2. First part of MD (1.)
cpp = /lib/cpp -traditional ;
define = -DFLEXIBLE;
constraints = hbonds
constraint_algorithm = SHAKE
integrator = md
dt = 0.001
nsteps = 20000
nstxout = 2000
nstxtcout = 2000
nstvout = 2000
nstfout = 2000
nstlog = 2000
coulombtype = PME
rcoulomb = 1.0
rcoulomb_switch = 0
pme_order = 4
optimize_fft = yes
fourierspacing = 0.12
ns_type = grid
vdwtype = Cut-off
rlist = 1.0
rvdw = 1.4
nstlist = 10
; Generate velocites is on at 300 K.
gen_vel = yes
gen_temp = 300
gen_seed = 173529
; Berendsen temperature coupling is on in four groups
Tcoupl = v-rescale
tau_t = 0.1 0.1
tc_grps = protein non-protein
ref_t = 300 300
; Pressure coupling
Pcoupl = berendsen
tau_p = 0.5
pcoupltype = isotropic
compressibility = 13.5e-5
ref_p = 3.0
; COM PULLING
; Pull type: no, umbrella, constraint or constant_force
pull = umbrella
pull_geometry = position
pull_dim = Y Y Y
pull_group0 = protein
pull_group1 = non-protein
pull_vec1 = 0.0 0.0 0.0
pull_init1 = 0.0 0.0 0.0
pull_rate1 = 0.0
pull_k1 = 2093
(In each of the six following simulations I will change just a number of
steps and pull value)
3. How can I perform a second part of simulation with a distance pull on
carbonyl carbon and water molecule? I have to rename this water and atom as
separate molecule? Any ideas?
And the last one...for what reason they used this force in pulling, not
another?
Thank you, yours faithfully.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://maillist.sys.kth.se/pipermail/gromacs.org_gmx-users/attachments/20091115/1285e312/attachment.html>
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list