[gmx-users] Fatal error: Atomtype Qd not found
rainy908 at yahoo.com
rainy908 at yahoo.com
Fri Mar 26 03:14:10 CET 2010
Hi Justin,
I did not mention that I am indeed trying run Gromacs implementing the
MARTINI force field. I realize this is not as automatic as selecting other
force fields in Gromacs using pdb2gmx. This issue has been previously
discussed in:
http://www.mail-archive.com/gmx-users@gromacs.org/msg14945.html
-Lili
On 25 March 2010 18:13, Justin A. Lemkul <jalemkul at vt.edu> wrote:
>
>
> rainy908 at yahoo.com wrote:
>
>> Dear GMX users,
>>
>> I have a quick question regarding which Gromacs force field in pdb2gmx is
>> best suited for creating a topology (itp) file for the enzyme, lactate
>> oxidase. So far the force fields in Gromacs 4.0.4 are:
>>
>> 0: GROMOS96 43a1 force field
>> 1: GROMOS96 43a2 force field (improved alkane dihedrals)
>> 2: GROMOS96 45a3 force field (Schuler JCC 2001 22 1205)
>> 3: GROMOS96 53a5 force field (JCC 2004 vol 25 pag 1656)
>> 4: GROMOS96 53a6 force field (JCC 2004 vol 25 pag 1656)
>> 5: OPLS-AA/L all-atom force field (2001 aminoacid dihedrals)
>> 6: [DEPRECATED] Gromacs force field (see manual)
>> 7: [DEPRECATED] Gromacs force field with hydrogens for NMR
>> 8: Encad all-atom force field, using scaled-down vacuum charges
>> 9: Encad all-atom force field, using full solvent charges
>> I selected the "G53a6 GROMOS96 53a6 Forcefield" for creating my itp file,
>> however, when I try to run grompp to generate the .tpr file, I get the
>> error:
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>> Program grompp_d, VERSION 4.0.4
>> Source code file: toppush.c, line: 947
>>
>> Fatal error:
>> Atomtype Qd not found
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> I've looked into other discussions on this (
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/gmx-users@gromacs.org/msg15722.html), and
>> concluded that the atomtype Qd must not be present in the G53a6 force field.
>> My system is simply the protein lactate oxidase. Does anyone have
>> suggestions on which force field(s) is best suited for this molecule?
>>
>>
> Since the atom type "Qd" is not present in the 53a6 parameter set, this
> error has nothing to do with the appropriateness of your force field choice.
> Somewhere, you've incorporated a nonsensical atom type. The only time I
> have ever seen "Qd" is in the MARTINI coarse grain force fields. Be sure
> you're using the topologies you think you are; if you really are using an
> unaltered pdb2gmx-generated topology for 53a6, there is no way that this
> atom type would be found therein.
>
> -Justin
>
> Thanks in advance,
>> Lili
>>
>>
> --
> ========================================
>
> Justin A. Lemkul
> Ph.D. Candidate
> ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
> MILES-IGERT Trainee
> Department of Biochemistry
> Virginia Tech
> Blacksburg, VA
> jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
> http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
>
> ========================================
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://maillist.sys.kth.se/pipermail/gromacs.org_gmx-users/attachments/20100325/100b3264/attachment.html>
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list