[gmx-users] Re: the output of do_dssp
Justin A. Lemkul
jalemkul at vt.edu
Wed May 26 13:42:11 CEST 2010
Hsin-Lin wrote:
> Hi, Justin
>
>
>
> Thank you for your patience.
>
> According your reply, I used trjconv to write only protein group into another
> file.
>
> I execute do_dssp again in group “protein”and “mainchain” respectively but
> still get coils more than total residues.
>
Can you post the text of your coordinate file (preferably not as an attachment,
just copy and paste it into an email)?
-Justin
> Why?
>
>
>
> Hsin-Lin
>
>
>
>
>
> Hsin-Lin wrote:
>
>> / Hi, Justin:/
>
>> / /
>
>> / Thank you for your reply./
>
>> / I try to select the group, 'mainchain', when prompted, and get the
>> quantity/
>
>> / of coil still larger than the number of residues of my protein./
>
>
>
> Then some other elements of your system are being detected as containing
>
> relevant atoms. What happens if you run do_dssp on a single structure
>
> containing only your protein?
>
>
>
>> / The data is the same as the output that generated by the selection, "1./
>
>> / Protein"./
>
>> / If I select backbone, I get the fatal error: /
>
>> / Failed to execute command: /Prousr/statphys/hsinlin/dssp/dsspcmbi -na/
>
>> / ddhIPvCe ddJ6Yv7a > /dev/null 2> /dev/null /
>
>> / /
>
>> / And I don't understand even if I can run the selection, "backbone",/
>
>> / successfully./
>
>
>
> No, you can't.
>
>
>
>> / According the dssp web of wiki:/
>
>> / http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DSSP_%28protein%29/
>
>> / the hydrogen bonds are dicided by O, C, H, and N four atoms./
>
>> / How can we get dssp analysis by backbone that includes only
>> NCCNCCNCC.....?/
>
>> / /
>
>
>
> You can't - DSSP requires the presence of the carbonyl O in order to
> determine
>
> hydrogen bonding geometry. If you don't have a full carbonyl, the analysis
> fails.
>
>
>
> -Justin
>
>
>
>> / Sincerely yours,/
>
>> / Hsin-Lin/
>
>>> / Hsin-Lin wrote:/
>
>>>> / Hi,/
>
>>>> / /
>
>>>> / I use do_dssp to generate xvg file collect the last line to make a
>>>> plot./
>
>>>> / There are something written in this way:/
>
>>>> / ------------------/
>
>>>> / @ s0 legend "Structure"/
>
>>>> / @ s1 legend "Coil"/
>
>>>> / @ s2 legend "Bend"/
>
>>>> / 0 5 14 1/
>
>>>> / -------------------/
>
>>>> / My system is dimer and each peptide has 6 residue./
>
>>> / Then you have a problem. Your output indicates 14 residues are in a/
>
>> / random/
>
>>> / coil, so either you have more than 12 total residues, or something
>>> went/
>
>> / wrong/
>
>>> / in/
>
>>> / the dssp calculation./
>
>>> / /
>
>>>> / And the number I choose to analyze is "1. Protein"./
>
>>>> / /
>
>>> / Perhaps this is why you had a problem. Normally, choosing "Protein"
>>> would/
>
>>> / cause/
>
>>> / the calculation to hang, but maybe that is not the case any more. See/
>>>
>
>> / here/
>
>>> / for/
>
>>> / the proper group to choose and the rationale:/
>
>>> / /
>
>>> / http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Gromacs_Utilities/do_dssp/
>
>>> / /
>
>>>> / Now I have a question, if I want to calculate the percentage of/
>
>> / secondary/
>
>>>> / structure./
>
>>>> / In the example above, is it calculated in this way 5/12=42%?/
>
>>>> / /
>
>>> / I'd question your results first...you don't have 12 residues in your/
>
>>> / calculation, otherwise your protein is 14/12 = 117% random coil! Also/
>>>
>
>> / realize/
>
>>> / that (by default) the "Structure" term only includes alpha helix, beta/
>>>
>
>> / strand,/
>
>>> / bend, and turn. Other structural elements are not included. That may
>>> or/
>
>>> / may/
>
>>> / not be what you want, depending on the structural elements of your/
>
>> / protein./
>
>>> / -Justin/
>
>>> / /
>
>>>> / Hsin-Lin/
>
>> / /
>
>> / /
>
>
>
--
========================================
Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
MILES-IGERT Trainee
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
========================================
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list