[gmx-users] Questions about GB parameters

Justin A. Lemkul jalemkul at vt.edu
Wed Jul 6 14:02:09 CEST 2011



Per Larsson wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> Yes, I did! Had to look up a conversation between me and the Tinker
> developers about precisely this.
> 
> The values are indeed not the original ones, but rather developed internally
> by Tinker people so to minimise differences between analytical surface areas
> and GB, given the HCT-algorithm and using per-atom rather than per-pair scale
> factors. The values have not been published anywhere as such but "have been
> used by others and seem fairly robust", according to Tinker developers.
> 
> In the light of all other approximations introduced with implicit solvent,
> the differences in results should be minor.
> 
> Of course this needs to be properly documented, and it was very good that
> some light was shed on this.
> 

Great, thanks for clarifying all of this!  I will make a note to adjust the 
documentation.  At the moment, it sounds as if one should expect the exact HCT 
pairwise scaling method, which is obviously not the case.

-Justin

> /Per
> 
> 
> 6 jul 2011 kl. 04:29 skrev "Justin A. Lemkul" <jalemkul at vt.edu>:
> 
>> 
>> Per Larsson wrote:
>>> Hi! I did some digging and think I can clarify at least the first
>>> question. Sorry for the confusion with regard to the earlier post. What
>>> is specified in the gbsa.itp file under the gbr column is indeed
>>> vdW-radii. These are used to compute Born radii, as the manual says. The
>>> dielectric offset is subtracted from the vdW radii, as this has been
>>> shown to improve the agreement between PB and GB calculations (see eg.
>>> the OBC-paper, Onufriev, Bashford and Case, Proteins, 55, 383-394). For
>>> the second question, I am a little confused myself now. The values found 
>>> in the gbsa.itp-file are exactly those found in the Tinker package (in
>>> the ksolv.f-routine), which also cites the same reference. Hmm...I'll be
>>> back again for this one.
>> Have you uncovered anything?  I've tried contacting the Tinker developers
>> but have received no response.  I found the routine (in Tinker's born.f)
>> that utilizes the values, but I still have no idea where they come from or
>> why they're fixed for a given atom type rather than a given pair.
>> 
>> -Justin
>> 
>> -- ========================================
>> 
>> Justin A. Lemkul Ph.D. Candidate ICTAS Doctoral Scholar MILES-IGERT Trainee
>>  Department of Biochemistry Virginia Tech Blacksburg, VA jalemkul[at]vt.edu
>> | (540) 231-9080 http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
>> 
>> ======================================== -- gmx-users mailing list
>> gmx-users at gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users 
>> Please search the archive at
>> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! Please
>> don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or
>> send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org. Can't post? Read
>> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> 
> 

-- 
========================================

Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
MILES-IGERT Trainee
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin

========================================



More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users mailing list