[gmx-users] a question about ensemble

francesco oteri francesco.oteri at gmail.com
Thu May 3 11:31:05 CEST 2012


2012/5/3 Dommert Florian <dommert at icp.uni-stuttgart.de>

> On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 10:48 +0200, francesco oteri wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > 2012/5/3 Dommert Florian <dommert at icp.uni-stuttgart.de>
> >         On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 07:32 +0200, Albert wrote:
> >         > hello:
> >         >
> >         >   I wondering are the three thermostat methods: Langevin,
> >         Berendsen
> >         > and Nose-Hoover chain are all compatible with semi-isotropy
> >         coupling
> >         > style? If I would like to use semi-isotropy coupling method,
> >         which one
> >         > would be better?
> >         >
> >         > thank you very much
> >         >
> >
> >         Hi,
> >
> >         what should be coupled in a semi-isotropic manner ? I assume
> >         the
> >         pressure and now the question is, which thermostat to apply,
> >         isn't it?
> >
> >         The three mentioned barostats are all of different kinds.
> >         While Langevin
> >         provides a thermostating method for implicit solvent, the
> >         other
> >         mentioned Thermostats are based on an explicit atom
> >         description of the
> >         system. However, the Berendsen thermostat quite old and not
> >         symplectic,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I remark that Langevin method is used also for explicit water system!
>
> But there a big question arises to me. The thermostatting by Langevin is
> achieved due to random kicks. If I simulate all atoms explicitly, there
> is only vacuum between the atoms. Where do the random kicks come from
> and how do I set gamma, which is actually related to the viscosity of
> the medium I am simulating in? If my medium is vacuum, then gamma should
> be zero, shouldn't it, and gamma=0 means no coupling, and hence,
> Newton's equation of motion are recovered.
>
> I am not an expert with the Langevin thermostat, so this are serious
> questions that arise to me now. Furthermore I also thought, that
> Langevin dynamics were exactly established for a description of a system
> within a medium.
>
>
Implicit Implicit solvent means accounting for the solvent presence without
including water atoms, look at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implicit_solvation for details.

Regarding the collision source, it is water! The gamma value represent the
average collision frequence experienced by a protein atoms against water in
solution.
You have no water, so it models the water presence.
In implicit water simulation, usually a value close to 50 ps-1 (the
experimental values) is used, while for explicit water is used a value
around 2-5ps-1 bacause
water is present so it actually collides with protein.



> /Flo
>
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >         which means that the phase space volume is not conserved.
> >         Fortunately,
> >         an updated method, the v-rescale thermostat of Bussi et al,
> >         has been
> >         published some years ago. It is quite similar to the Berendsen
> >         thermostat, but symplectic and suitable for production and
> >         equilibration. Finally the Nose-Hoover chain (NHC) is based on
> >         a
> >         extended Lagrangian for the system you want to simulate and
> >         corresponding equations of motions are applied in order to
> >         keep the
> >         temperature constant. NHC is symplectic, too, but not suitable
> >         for
> >         equilibration. However, as the only reasonable method for
> >         anisotropic
> >         pressure coupling is the Parrinello-Rahman (PR) barostat, or
> >         its
> >         extended version MTTK, which relies on the same idea as NHC, I
> >         would
> >         assume, that for production a combination of NHC and MTTK is a
> >         good
> >         choice. For the equilibration I would use a v-rescale
> >         thermostat and the
> >         Berendsen barostat, because PR and MTTK would take far too
> >         much time to
> >         achieve equilibrium.
> >
> >         Hence, it much depends on the purpose, which combination of
> >         thermo- and
> >         barostat is the most suitable one.
> >
> >         /Flo
> >
> >
> >
> > Anyway, I think that there is no strict coupling between temperature
> > and pressure coupling:
> > You need to keep the tempaerature fixed around a value and the same
> > for pressure, so
> > I guess any combination v-rescale, NHC, Langevin versus PR or MTTK is,
> > in priciple, right.
> >
> >
> > Maybe convergence speed changes, but in this case banchmark are quite
> > useful very welcolme!
> >
> >
> > best,
> > Francesco
> >
> >
> >
> >         > best
> >         > Albert
> >         > --
> >         > gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users at gromacs.org
> >         > http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> >         > Please search the archive at
> >         http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before
> >         posting!
> >         > Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use
> >         the
> >         > www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> >         > Can't post? Read
> >         http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> >
> >         --
> >         Florian Dommert
> >         Dipl. - Phys.
> >
> >         Institute for Computational Physics
> >         University Stuttgart
> >
> >         Pfaffenwaldring 27
> >         70569 Stuttgart
> >
> >         EMail: dommert at icp.uni-stuttgart.de
> >         Homepage: http://www.icp.uni-stuttgart.de/~icp/Florian_Dommert
> >
> >         Tel.: +49 - (0)711 - 68563613
> >         Fax.: +49 - (0)711 - 68563658
> >
> >         --
> >         gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users at gromacs.org
> >         http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> >         Please search the archive at
> >         http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before
> >         posting!
> >         Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> >         www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> >         Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cordiali saluti, Dr.Oteri Francesco
> > --
> > gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users at gromacs.org
> > http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> > Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
> > Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> > www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> > Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
> --
> Florian Dommert
> Dipl. - Phys.
>
> Institute for Computational Physics
> University Stuttgart
>
> Pfaffenwaldring 27
> 70569 Stuttgart
>
> EMail: dommert at icp.uni-stuttgart.de
> Homepage: http://www.icp.uni-stuttgart.de/~icp/Florian_Dommert
>
> Tel.: +49 - (0)711 - 68563613
> Fax.: +49 - (0)711 - 68563658
>
> --
> gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users at gromacs.org
> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>



-- 
Cordiali saluti, Dr.Oteri Francesco
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://maillist.sys.kth.se/pipermail/gromacs.org_gmx-users/attachments/20120503/05d87e57/attachment.html>


More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users mailing list