[gmx-users] Re: Hardware for best gromacs performance?

[Szilárd Páll]

Brad,

These numbers seems rather low for a standard simulation setup! Did
you use a particularly long cut-off or short time-step?

Cheers,
--
Szilárd Páll


On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Brad Van Oosten <bv07ay at brocku.ca> wrote:
> Im not sure on the prices of these systems any more, they are getting dated
> so they will be on the low end price wise. I have a 30,000 ish atom lipid
> system for all my simulations so this might be helpful:
>
> System 1
> CPU - dual 6 core xeon @ 2.8 GHz
> GPU - 2x GTX 680
> 50 ns/day
>
> System 2
> CPU - dual 4 core intel E5607 @ 2.26 GHz
> GPU - 2x M2070
> 45 ns/day
>
> System 3
> CPU - dual 4 core intel E5620 @ 2.40 GHz
> GPU - 1x GTX 680
> 40 ns/day
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble.com/Hardware-for-best-gromacs-performance-tp5012124p5012152.html
> Sent from the GROMACS Users Forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> --
> gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users at gromacs.org
> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
> * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists