[gmx-users] Bilayer COM removal issue: Large VCM
rajat desikan
rajatdesikan at gmail.com
Sun Nov 10 20:08:51 CET 2013
Hi All,
I am experiencing a few problems in membrane simulations wrt COM removal. I
downloaded a 400 ns pre-equilibrated Slipid-DMPC membrane with all the
accompanying files. I then carried out the following steps:
1) energy minimization
2) NVT Eq - 100 ps
3) NPT Eq - 250 ps (Berendsen temp, Pres coupling)
Then I used g_select to select the upper and lower DMPC leaflets. The then
carried out a 250 ps NPT eq again. The only change was:
comm-grps = SOL DMPC ==> comm-grps
= SOL upper lower
On every step in log file, I get the following message:
* Step Time Lambda 124000
248.00000 0.00000Large VCM(group lower): -0.00051,
-0.00515, -0.00652, Temp-cm: 8.11828e+29 Energies
(kJ/mol) U-B Proper Dih. Improper Dih. LJ-14
Coulomb-14 7.23818e+04 4.19778e+04 6.46641e+02 4.54801e+03
-1.45245e+05 LJ (SR) LJ (LR) Disper. corr. Coulomb (SR)
Coul. recip. 2.79689e+04 -3.78407e+03 -2.10679e+03 -5.84134e+05
-8.87497e+04 Potential Kinetic En. Total Energy Temperature
Pres. DC (bar) -6.76497e+05 1.76468e+05 -5.00029e+05
3.10424e+02 -1.05704e+02 Pressure (bar) Constr. rmsd -1.85927e+02
6.42934e-06*
*Large VCM(group lower): -0.00187, -0.00369, 0.00032,
Temp-cm: 2.02076e+29Large VCM(group lower): -0.00725,
-0.00278, -0.00549, Temp-cm: 1.05988e+30Large VCM(group lower):
0.00020, 0.00308, -0.00176, Temp-cm: 1.48126e+29Large VCM(group
lower): -0.00541, 0.00546, -0.00166, Temp-cm:
7.24656e+29Large VCM(group lower): -0.00220, 0.00362,
-0.00741, Temp-cm: 8.53812e+29Large VCM(group lower): 0.00140,
-0.00160, 0.00029, Temp-cm: 5.39679e+28Large VCM(group lower):
-0.00056, -0.00293, -0.00364, Temp-cm: 2.59422e+29Large VCM(group
lower): -0.00172, -0.00260, 0.00494, Temp-cm:
3.99945e+29Large VCM(group lower): 0.00252, 0.00594,
0.00068, Temp-cm: 4.93342e+29*
*DD step 124999 vol min/aver 0.702 load imb.: force 1.3% pme
mesh/force 0.636*
I do not know what to make of it. There are no issues when I remove COM for
the entire system. I have seen this issue come up a few times in the
archives too, but I didn't find a satisfactory solution since the bilayer
was very well equilibrated.
I would appreciate any suggestions. Thank you.
--
Rajat Desikan (Ph.D Scholar)
Prof. K. Ganapathy Ayappa's Lab (no 13),
Dept. of Chemical Engineering,
Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list