[gmx-users] (no subject)
Mark Abraham
mark.j.abraham at gmail.com
Mon Nov 18 16:14:12 CET 2013
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Shima Arasteh
<shima_arasteh2001 at yahoo.com>wrote:
> Dear gmx users,
>
>
> My simulated system contains is composed of lipid, protein and water
> molecules.
> The NPT and NVT steps were done with position restraints on protein atoms.
> Then I removed the position restraints by line ";define = -DPOSRES_LIPID
> -DPOSRES". But I still see the position restraint term in md.log file,
> however it seems to be small.
>
> Forexample as below:
>
>
> Energies (kJ/mol)
> Bond U-B Proper Dih. Improper Dih. CMAP Dih.
> 4.22077e+03 2.41766e+04 1.67865e+04 1.72538e+02 -1.02944e+01
> LJ-14 Coulomb-14 LJ (SR) Disper. corr. Coulomb (SR)
> 2.65248e+03 -3.79682e+04 1.09363e+04 -1.49330e+03 -2.05391e+05
> Coul. recip. Position Rest. Potential Kinetic En. Total Energy
> -9.97720e+02 4.84025e+01 -1.86867e+05 6.61349e+04 -1.20732e+05
> Temperature Pres. DC (bar) Pressure (bar) Constr. rmsd
> 3.12903e+02 -1.07476e+02 2.87101e+02 1.52447e-06
>
> Would you please let me know what this term means? And why position
> restraints still exist? Is this amount of position restraint affects the
> results significantly?
>
Use grompp -pp to see the results of how grompp interpreted all of your
inputs. There will be a position_restraints directive there somewhere, from
which you can work backwards to see its origin.
Mark
>
> Thanks in advance. I appreciate your suggestions.
>
>
>
> Sincerely,
> Shima
> --
> gromacs.org_gmx-users mailing list
> gromacs.org_gmx-users at maillist.sys.kth.se
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users
> * Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
> * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list