[gmx-users] GPU Acceleration in case of Implicit Solvent Simulations
mark.j.abraham at gmail.com
Fri Aug 29 11:17:19 CEST 2014
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 11:59 PM, Siva Dasetty <sdasett at g.clemson.edu>
> Dear all,
> Can we use periodic boundary conditions in case of implicit solvent
Yes (but I only recommend doing so in GROMACS 4.5.x)
> If so, why?
In general, why not? It's a boundary condition. What's special about
infinite boundary conditions?
> Also, can implicit solvent model in gromacs in any version (till 5.0) be
> implemented in more than 2 processors or can it at least use GPU
> acceleration provided by gromacs?
No - the implicit solvent code has been unmaintained in practice, starting
with 4.6. Last I looked, only infinite boundary conditions and a single
thread worked. You'll probably get better mileage on GPUs with AMBER, which
actively targets this type of simulation.
I have tried using pbc=no and group cut-off scheme in gpu based gromacs
> V5.0, but there is a warning which says GPU is disabled because it
> effectively works only with verlet cut-off scheme and verlet cut-off scheme
> requires pbc=xyz or xy.
Correct. In 4.6 and 5.0, the required machinery for using GPUs and doing
implicit solvation are almost completely mismatched.
> Also tried implementing in gromacs version 4.5.5 using openMM after
> following the installation instructions in the following link, (
> and here again there is no luck as we dont have the compatible hardware.
> Gromacs Users mailing list
> * Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users