[gmx-users] Re : NPT Simulation average pressure lower than Reference set pressure
Agnivo Gosai
agnivogromacs14 at gmail.com
Sun Nov 2 04:56:12 CET 2014
Dear Users
I am sharing a few plots through Google Drive. If you are able to view the
files then kindly comment.
My workflow is as follows :-
1) Topolgy preparation with AMBER99SB-Parmbsc0 ff in GROMACS 4.5.6. TIP3P
water model.
2) Putting the complex in a box , using spc216 to solvate , adding ions.
3) Energy minimization with steepest descent.
4) 100 ps NVT equilibration with V-rescale thermostat. Ref T = 300 K , Avg.
T = 299.7 K and Total Energy also remained constant.
5) 1st NPT simulation with Berendsen barostat (Ref. Pressure = 1 bar)
having the following results :
( A)Statistics over 50001 steps [ 0.0000 through 100.0000 ps ], 1 data sets
All statistics are over 10001 points
Energy Average Err.Est. RMSD Tot-Drift
------------------------------
Pressure -5.5706 6.2 84.8085 38.1219 (bar)
(B)All statistics are over 10001 points
Energy Average Err.Est. RMSD Tot-Drift
------------------------------
Density 1012.13 0.55 1.87172 3.17412
(kg/m^3)
6) 2nd NPT simulation with Parrinello-Rahman barostat (Ref. Pressure = 1
bar) having the following results :
These are the average values :-
Energy Average Err.Est. RMSD Tot-Drift
------------------------------
Pressure -0.299523 0.64 93.313 -1.18081 (bar)
Energy Average Err.Est. RMSD Tot-Drift
------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------
Density 1012.32 0.26 1.68576 0.82485
(kg/m^3)
7)3rd NPT simulation with Parrinello-Rahman barostat (Ref. Pressure = 1
bar) having the following results :
Statistics over 50001 steps [ 0.0000 through 100.0000 ps ], 1 data sets
All statistics are over 10001 points
Energy Average Err.Est. RMSD Tot-Drift
-------------------------------------------------
Pressure 2.03959 0.9 95.9974 -6.788 (bar)
All statistics are over 10001 points
Energy Average Err.Est. RMSD Tot-Drift
------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------
Density 1012.8 0.15 1.60294 0.243262
(kg/m^3)
All the NPT equilibrations are of 100 ps and are continued from the
previous equilibration.
I observe that the average pressure has not yet reached the reference
pressure and in the 3rd NPT run the Err.Est. , RMSD and Drift has increased.
I have gone through the different comments and suggestions to my earlier
posts. I am thinking of a 500 ps or 1 ns run with the Parinello Rahman
barostat. Or am I failing to understand the physical significance of these
average values and should have stopped after the 2nd NPT equilibration ?
em_potential.png
<https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B-U8uULVZjfRZ0xfZGVrLVRYQVU/edit?usp=drive_web>
npt1_density.png
<https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B-U8uULVZjfRYUpKeGZfenNqRnM/edit?usp=drive_web>
npt1_pressure.png
<https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B-U8uULVZjfRa1FSWkNCTkxkM28/edit?usp=drive_web>
npt1_temp.png
<https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B-U8uULVZjfRcmFmdHBybjZRTnM/edit?usp=drive_web>
npt2density.png
<https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B-U8uULVZjfRaUZKa1JJNWJCcU0/edit?usp=drive_web>
npt2_pressure.png
<https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B-U8uULVZjfRTng2eW1iQUxPamc/edit?usp=drive_web>
npt3_density.png
<https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B-U8uULVZjfRUGJSQU9MRnhlUTQ/edit?usp=drive_web>
npt3_pressure.png
<https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B-U8uULVZjfRcXFJZkt3N1YtdzQ/edit?usp=drive_web>
nvt_temp.png
<https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B-U8uULVZjfRLTNNcmlEcFNSWDg/edit?usp=drive_web>
nvt_totalenergy.png
<https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B-U8uULVZjfRNFBZd05kMXNoYW8/edit?usp=drive_web>
Could anybody suggest why the reference pressure is not being reached ?
Thanks & Regards
Agnivo Gosai
Grad Student, Iowa State University.
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list