[gmx-users] Umbrella Sampling gromacs 5.0 error
Alexander Law
alexander.law at pg.canterbury.ac.nz
Tue Nov 18 05:03:00 CET 2014
Dear vmx-users
I am running through Dr Lemkul's umbrella sampling tutorial and applying this to my own structure. I have problem with the pull simulation command: grompp -f md_pull.mdp -c npt.gro -p topol.top -n index.ndx -t npt.cpt -o pull.tpr
I receive this error message back:
Ignoring obsolete mdp entry 'title'
Ignoring obsolete mdp entry 'optimize_fft'
Replacing old mdp entry 'nstxtcout' by 'nstxout-compressed'
ERROR: pull-coord1-groups should have 2 components
WARNING 1 [file md_pull.mdp, line 62]:
Unknown left-hand 'pull-group0' in parameter file
WARNING 2 [file md_pull.mdp, line 62]:
Unknown left-hand 'pull-group1' in parameter file
WARNING 3 [file md_pull.mdp, line 62]:
Unknown left-hand 'pull_rate1' in parameter file
WARNING 4 [file md_pull.mdp, line 62]:
Unknown left-hand 'pull_k1' in parameter file
NOTE 2 [file md_pull.mdp]:
With Verlet lists the optimal nstlist is >= 10, with GPUs >= 20. Note
that with the Verlet scheme, nstlist has no effect on the accuracy of
your simulation.
NOTE 3 [file md_pull.mdp]:
nstcomm < nstcalcenergy defeats the purpose of nstcalcenergy, setting
nstcomm to nstcalcenergy
NOTE 4 [file md_pull.mdp]:
leapfrog does not yet support Nose-Hoover chains, nhchainlength reset to 1
------------------------------
Fatal error:
Group Protein referenced in the .mdp file was not found in the index file.
Group names must match either [moleculetype] names or custom index group
names, in which case you must supply an index file to the '-n' option
of grompp.
My Index file is set up properly, with force being applied to Chain_A, and Chain_B is my static reference:
0 Chain_B : 1290 atoms
1 Chain_A : 110 atoms
The md_pull.mdp remains the same:
; Pull code
pull = umbrella
pull_geometry = distance ; simple distance increase
pull_dim = N N Y
pull_start = yes ; define initial COM distance > 0
pull_ngroups = 1
pull_group0 = Chain_B
pull_group1 = Chain_A
pull_rate1 = 0.01 ; 0.01 nm per ps = 10 nm per ns
pull_k1 = 1000 ; kJ mol^-1 nm^-2
Any advice on how to treat this problem is appreciated.
Cheers,
Alex
This email may be confidential and subject to legal privilege, it may
not reflect the views of the University of Canterbury, and it is not
guaranteed to be virus free. If you are not an intended recipient,
please notify the sender immediately and erase all copies of the message
and any attachments.
Please refer to http://www.canterbury.ac.nz/emaildisclaimer for more
information.
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list