[gmx-users] Error while running free energy simulation.

vivek sharma viveksharma.iitb at gmail.com
Wed Nov 19 14:50:24 CET 2014


Dear Justin,
Thanks for ypour reply.
My runs are getting failed at multiple lambda values, say 4 out of 21. For
some cases, these runs go fine when I change pcouple to berendsen. Is it
acceptable to use berendsen instead of PR for such simulations.

I guess I need to do more equilibration on my system as my runs are getting
failed at production run phase. How will I decide the end point for
equilibration?

Thanks and regards,
Vivek

On 11 November 2014 18:03, Justin Lemkul <jalemkul at vt.edu> wrote:

>
>
> On 11/11/14 2:12 AM, vivek sharma wrote:
>
>> Dear Users,
>> I am trying to replicate the free energy tutorial by Dr Justin. In my
>> attempt I have calculated the OPLS-AA FF parameters for my molecules of
>> interest using acpype. I made the system in water and 1-octanol, While
>> running the independent lambda simulation for both the systems, I got an
>> error while running the simulation for 1-octanol system whereas the
>> simulation for water system were successful.
>>
>> Following is the error message reported in failed simulation for 1-octanol
>> system
>>
>
> Which lambda state fails?  Or is it multiple?  Does failure occur during
> equilibration or production?  If the latter, you probably just need to
> equilibrate more thoroughly.  If the former, energy-minimize more
> rigorously.
>
> -Justin
>
>
>  ------------------------------------------------------------------
>> WARNING: Listed nonbonded interaction between particles 842 and 851
>> at distance 427.422 which is larger than the table limit 2.200 nm.
>>
>> This is likely either a 1,4 interaction, or a listed interaction inside
>> a smaller molecule you are decoupling during a free energy calculation.
>> Since interactions at distances beyond the table cannot be computed,
>> they are skipped until they are inside the table limit again. You will
>> only see this message once, even if it occurs for several interactions.
>>
>> IMPORTANT: This should not happen in a stable simulation, so there is
>> probably something wrong with your system. Only change the table-extension
>> distance in the mdp file if you are really sure that is the reason.
>>
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> I tried running the same system without free energy option ( free_energy
>>             = no), which was successful. It has narrowed the reason for
>> error to be the free energy code.
>> It will be really helpful if anybody can help me in understanding the
>> probable reason for error and any directions for handling this error.
>>
>> Pasting below the mdp options for one of the independent lambda simulation
>> for reference.
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> -----------------------------------------------
>> ; Run control
>> integrator               = sd       ; Langevin dynamics
>> tinit                    = 0
>> dt                       = 0.002
>> nsteps                   = 2500000   ; 5 ns
>> nstcomm                  = 100
>> ; Output control
>> nstxout                  = 500
>> nstvout                  = 500
>> nstfout                  = 0
>> nstlog                   = 500
>> nstenergy                = 500
>> nstxout-compressed       = 0
>> ; Neighborsearching and short-range nonbonded interactions
>> cutoff-scheme            = verlet
>> nstlist                  = 20
>> ns_type                  = grid
>> pbc                      = xyz
>> rlist                    = 1.2
>> ; Electrostatics
>> coulombtype              = PME
>> rcoulomb                 = 1.2
>> ; van der Waals
>> vdwtype                  = cutoff
>> vdw-modifier             = potential-switch
>> rvdw-switch              = 1.0
>> rvdw                     = 1.2
>> ; Apply long range dispersion corrections for Energy and Pressure
>> DispCorr                  = EnerPres
>> ; Spacing for the PME/PPPM FFT grid
>> fourierspacing           = 0.12
>> ; EWALD/PME/PPPM parameters
>> pme_order                = 6
>> ewald_rtol               = 1e-06
>> epsilon_surface          = 0
>> ; Temperature coupling
>> ; tcoupl is implicitly handled by the sd integrator
>> tc_grps                  = system
>> tau_t                    = 1.0
>> ref_t                    = 300
>> ; Pressure coupling is on for NPT
>> Pcoupl                   = Parrinello-Rahman
>> tau_p                    = 1.0
>> compressibility          = 4.5e-05
>> ref_p                    = 1.0
>> ; Free energy control stuff
>> free_energy              = yes
>> init_lambda_state        = 0
>> delta_lambda             = 0
>> calc_lambda_neighbors    = 1        ; only immediate neighboring windows
>> ; Vectors of lambda specified here
>> ; Each combination is an index that is retrieved from init_lambda_state
>> for
>> each simulation
>> ; init_lambda_state        0    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    8    9
>>   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20
>> vdw_lambdas              = 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80
>> 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
>> coul_lambdas             = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
>> 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00
>> ; We are not transforming any bonded or restrained interactions
>> bonded_lambdas           = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
>> 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
>> restraint_lambdas        = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
>> 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
>> ; Masses are not changing (particle identities are the same at lambda = 0
>> and lambda = 1)
>> mass_lambdas             = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
>> 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
>> ; Not doing simulated temperting here
>> temperature_lambdas      = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
>> 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
>> ; Options for the decoupling
>> sc-alpha                 = 0.5
>> sc-coul                  = no       ; linear interpolation of Coulomb
>> (none
>> in this case)
>> sc-power                 = 1.0
>> sc-sigma                 = 0.3
>> couple-moltype           = FEL  ; name of moleculetype to decouple
>> couple-lambda0           = none      ; only van der Waals interactions
>> couple-lambda1           = vdw-q     ; turn off everything, in this case
>> only vdW
>> couple-intramol          = no
>> nstdhdl                  = 10
>> ; Do not generate velocities
>> gen_vel                  = no
>> ; options for bonds
>> constraints              = all-bonds  ; we only have C-H bonds here
>> ; Type of constraint algorithm
>> constraint-algorithm     = lincs
>> ; Constrain the starting configuration
>> ; since we are continuing from NPT
>> continuation             = yes
>> ; Highest order in the expansion of the constraint coupling matrix
>> lincs-order              = 12
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Thanks in advance
>>
>> regards,
>> Vivek Sharma
>>
>>
> --
> ==================================================
>
> Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
> Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow
>
> Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
> School of Pharmacy
> Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629
> University of Maryland, Baltimore
> 20 Penn St.
> Baltimore, MD 21201
>
> jalemkul at outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
> http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul
>
> ==================================================
> --
> Gromacs Users mailing list
>
> * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/
> Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
>
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>


More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users mailing list