[gmx-users] constraint and restraints
niyaz.sabir
niyaz.sabir at gmail.com
Mon Oct 6 13:55:39 CEST 2014
Dear Tsjerk,
Thank you very much. You are always ready to help.
I have understood and taken your note : "Whether it makes sense is another question. The dynamics is usually coupled throughout the protein."
With very best regards,
Niyaz
----- Original Message -----
From: Tsjerk Wassenaar
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users ; niyaz.sabir
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2014 1:13 AM
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] constraint and restraints
Hi Niyaz,
You can set position restraints for all atoms not in that residue range. Whether it makes sense is another question. The dynamics is usually coupled throughout the protein.
Cheers,
Tsjerk
On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 10:03 PM, niyaz.sabir <niyaz.sabir at gmail.com> wrote:
Dear GROMACS users,
Is it possible with Gromacs and how could be done a simulation keeping almost all protein residues fixed except for instance resi 361-372 ? Will the extraction of resulting rmsd for each residue give some knowledge regarding its flexibility (mobility) ?
Regards, N.S.
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
--
Tsjerk A. Wassenaar, Ph.D.
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list