[gmx-users] intel compiler for AMD CPU?
Johnny Lu
johnny.lu128 at gmail.com
Fri Oct 10 21:00:40 CEST 2014
wikipedia still says intel compiler make slower code for amd:
"The compilers generate optimized code for IA-32
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IA-32> and Intel 64
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_64> architectures, but non-optimized
code on non-Intel but compatible processors, such as certain AMD
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Micro_Devices> processors. A
specific release of the compiler (11.1) is available for development of
Linux-based applications for IA-64 (Itanium
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Itanium> 2) processors" --
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_C%2B%2B_Compiler
But then, 2008 tests by some random programmers say patched icc is still
better than gcc
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=824046
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Albert <mailmd2011 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I doubt this. According to my own experiences, intel c++ plus intel MPI
> make the best efficiency.......
>
> but I am not so sure for this under AMD CPU....
>
>
> On 10/10/2014 08:47 PM, Johnny Lu wrote:
>
>> The mailling list said that for intel xeon, gcc+fftw3 make faster gromacs
>> than intel c/c++ compiler + intel math kernel library.
>>
>
> --
> Gromacs Users mailing list
>
> * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/
> Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
>
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list