[gmx-users] Lithium Ions in Gromos53A6

Dr. Vitaly Chaban vvchaban at gmail.com
Sat Oct 11 23:40:30 CEST 2014


What about taking another alkali ion (are thery any in CROMOS53?) and
adjusting sigma&epsilon to reflect smaller size of Li(+)?

Of course, lithium is a pretty polarizable guy with certain covalent
bonding ambitions, but this does not prevent people to simulate it as
a hard [+1e] sphere...


Dr. Vitaly V. Chaban

Виталий Витальевич ЧАБАН


On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Hardy, Adam <ah259 at hw.ac.uk> wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I find myself requiring lithium ions in a simulation using (a variant of) the Gromos53A6 forcefield.
>
> Chaging forcefields is not an appealing proposition due to the time already invested in the current one, so I was wondering had any suggestions or has perhaps gone to the effort of creating parameters for it?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Adam Hardy
> PhD Student
> School of Engineering and Physical Sciences
> Heriot-Watt University
> Edinburgh EH14 4AS, UK
>
>
> -----
> We invite research leaders and ambitious early career researchers to
> join us in leading and driving research in key inter-disciplinary themes.
> Please see www.hw.ac.uk/researchleaders for further information and how
> to apply.
>
> Heriot-Watt University is a Scottish charity
> registered under charity number SC000278.
>
> --
> Gromacs Users mailing list
>
> * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
>
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.


More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users mailing list