[gmx-users] Check for Vacuum Bubbles & Density
Johnny Lu
johnny.lu128 at gmail.com
Sat Oct 18 16:32:31 CEST 2014
Hi.
The NPT simulation has 9K TIP3P water with 173 amino acid residues and uses
Amber99SB-ILDN force field, and use Berendsen barostat and V-rescale
thermostat. I plan to run NVT with the same pressure an temperature after
this.
The average density is 1015 kg/m^3 over 35ns. The density was near 1015
over more than 300 ns, in previous NPT simulations.
Statistics over 34744941 steps [ 0.0000 through 34744.9400 ps ], 5 data
sets
All statistics are over 6948989 points
Energy Average Err.Est. RMSD Tot-Drift
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Energy -307197 210 880.41 -1408.29
(kJ/mol)
Temperature 299.993 0.0037 1.70813 0.0273197
(K)
Pressure 1.00317 0.009 138.426 -0.0381886
(bar)
Volume 298.567 0.049 0.371817 -0.314958
(nm^3)
Density 1014.8 0.17 1.26377 1.07078
(kg/m^3)
This is higher than the 982.3 value in the mail-list [
https://www.mail-archive.com/gmx-users@gromacs.org/msg29327.html]. Why the
density is different?
I used a 1.0 nm cut off, following the force-field paper: Improved
side-chain torsion potentials for the Amber ff99SB protein force field [
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2970904/], but I also added
dispersion correction. Should I not use dispersion correction?
I look at the trajectory in VMD with periodic images turn on. But there
were many water that overlap each other, and I can not see any vacuum
bubble clearly (if there is a vacuum bubble) [
http://archive.ambermd.org/201103/0431.html]. Is there a better way to
check for vacuum bubbles?
I didn't know a long NVT equilibration at 300 K, right after minimization,
can make vacuum bubbles. The NVT equilibration was 300 ps.
I also didn't know that I should run berendsen barostat before
Parrinello-Rahman, so those 300+ ns NPT simulations before this one all
uses
Parrinello-Rahman barostat.
If there is no vacuum bubbles, I think I was just lucky.
Below is the mdp file I used for the NPT simulation:
title = NPT production
; Run parameters
integrator = md-vv ; leap-frog integrator
nsteps = 36000000 ; 1 ns
dt = 0.001 ; 1 fs
; Output control
nstenergy = 10 ; save energies every 1.0 ps
nstlog = 5000 ; update log file every 0.2 ps
; Bond parameters
continuation = yes ; Restarting after NVT
constraint_algorithm = lincs ; holonomic constraints
constraints = H-bonds ; all bonds (even heavy atom-H bonds)
constrained
lincs_iter = 2 ; accuracy of LINCS
lincs_order = 4 ; also related to accuracy
; Neighborsearching
ns_type = grid ; search neighboring grid cells
nstlist = 10 ; 10 fs
rlist = 1.0 ; short-range neighborlist cutoff (in
nm)
rcoulomb = 1.0 ; short-range electrostatic cutoff (in
nm)
rvdw = 1.0 ; short-range van der Waals cutoff (in
nm)
; Electrostatics
coulombtype = PME ; Particle Mesh Ewald for long-range
electrostatics
pme_order = 4 ; cubic interpolation
fourierspacing = 0.1 ; grid spacing for FFT
; Temperature coupling is on
tcoupl = V-rescale ; modified Berendsen thermostat
tc-grps = system ; single thermostat
tau_t = 1.0 ; time constant, in ps
ref_t = 300 ; reference temperature, one for each
group, in K
; Pressure coupling is on
pcoupl = berendsen ; Pressure coupling on in NPT
pcoupltype = isotropic ; uniform scaling of box vectors
tau_p = 2.0 ; time constant, in ps
ref_p = 1.0 ; reference pressure, in bar
compressibility = 4.5e-5 ; isothermal compressibility of water,
bar^-1
refcoord_scaling = com
; Periodic boundary conditions
pbc = xyz ; 3-D PBC
; Dispersion correction
DispCorr = EnerPres ; account for cut-off vdW scheme
; Velocity generation
gen_vel = no ; Velocity generation is off
cutoff-scheme = Verlet
Thank you again.
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list