[gmx-users] solvation free energy, electrostatic transformation
Daniele Veclani
danieleveclani at gmail.com
Mon Jul 27 16:28:56 CEST 2015
Yes I have a experimental value.
DGexp=1.99 kcal/mol
DGcalc.=-14.36 kcal/mol
But if I stop the VdW transformation, i get:
DGonlyVdW= 2.38 and this value is in line with other data found in the
literature.
Thank you for your answer
D.V.
2015-07-27 16:08 GMT+02:00 Justin Lemkul <jalemkul at vt.edu>:
>
>
> On 7/27/15 9:55 AM, Daniele Veclani wrote:
>
>> I'm trying to calculate the solvation free energy of a molecule (M).
>>
>> I have done a VdW. transformation.
>>
>> I have done also a electrostatic transformation. But I get an incorrect
>> value (large overestimation of DG solvation).
>>
>>
> So presumably you have an experimental value of DGsolv? How different are
> the values?
>
>
> I use gromacs 5.0.4 with gromos 54a7 force fields and my .mdp file (for
>> lambda 00) is:
>> integrator = sd
>> tinit = 0
>> dt = 0.002
>> nsteps = 2500000
>> comm_mode = angular
>> nstcomm = 100
>> nstxout = 500
>> nstvout = 500
>> nstfout = 0
>> nstlog = 500
>> nstenergy = 500
>> nstxout-compressed = 0
>> cutoff-scheme = group
>> nstlist = 0
>> ns_type = simple
>> pbc = no
>> rlist = 0
>> coulombtype = cutoff
>> rcoulomb = 0
>> epsilon_r = 1
>> vdwtype = cutoff
>> rvdw = 0
>> DispCorr = no
>> fourierspacing = 0.12
>> pme_order = 6
>> ewald_rtol = 1e-06
>> epsilon_surface = 0
>> tcoupl = berendsen
>> tc_grps = system
>> tau_t = 0.1
>> ref_t = 300
>> Pcoupl = no
>> tau_p = 1.0
>> compressibility = 4.5e-05
>> ref_p = 1.0
>> free_energy = yes
>> init_lambda_state = 0
>> delta_lambda = 0
>> calc_lambda_neighbors = 1
>> vdw_lambdas = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
>> 1.00 1.00
>> coul_lambdas = 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80
>> 0.90 1.00
>> bonded_lambdas = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
>> 0.00 0.00
>> restraint_lambdas = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
>> 0.00 0.00
>> mass_lambdas = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
>> 0.00 0.00
>> temperature_lambdas = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
>> 0.00 0.00
>> sc-alpha = 0.5
>> sc-coul = no
>> sc-power = 1.0
>> sc-sigma = 0.3
>> couple-moltype = QUI
>> couple-lambda0 = vdw-q
>>
>> couple-lambda1 = vdw
>> couple-intramol = no
>> nstdhdl = 10
>> gen_vel = no
>> constraints = all-bonds ; we only have C-H bonds here
>> constraint-algorithm = lincs
>> continuation = no
>> lincs-order = 12
>>
>>
>> What's wrong?
>>
>>
> If you're getting a result that does not agree with a known quantity,
> without any errors in the run or the analysis, it means your topology for
> that molecule is bad and needs to be better parametrized.
>
> -Justin
>
> --
> ==================================================
>
> Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
> Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow
>
> Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
> School of Pharmacy
> Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629
> University of Maryland, Baltimore
> 20 Penn St.
> Baltimore, MD 21201
>
> jalemkul at outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
> http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul
>
> ==================================================
> --
> Gromacs Users mailing list
>
> * Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> posting!
>
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list