[gmx-users] factor of 1.25 in lipid and GROMOS87 parameter
Rakesh Gupta
gupta.rakesh082 at gmail.com
Wed Mar 25 19:55:30 CET 2015
Dear gmx users
I am using berger force field for the simulation of lipid bilayers which is
combination of gromos87 and OPLS. Could any one explain how the cross non
bonded parameters (c6 and c12) were calculated in lipid.itp(
http://wcm.ucalgary.ca/tieleman/downloads).
I took LP2 parameter from the original paper of Berger et al. (sigma= 0.396
nm & epsilon = 0.380 KJ/mole) and calculated cross non bonded parameters
with the gromos87 atoms (taken from ffgmxnb.itp) using two different
combination rules.
Parameters in lipid.itp file:
Atom1 Atom2 C6 C12
LP2 O 0.004536057 5.11881E-06
LP2 OA 0.004536057 7.29511E-06
LP2 N 0.004707795 7.73289E-06
LP2 NL 0.004707795 7.73289E-06
LP2 C 0.004614105 1.09185E-05
LP2 CH1 0.01066219 5.03492E-05
LP2 CH2 0.0090975 0.000035333
LP2 CH3 0.008986321 3.03967E-05
LP2 CR51 0.007082114 2.31135E-05
LP2 CR61 0.007082114 2.31135E-05
LP2 CB 0.004614105 1.09185E-05
LP2 CA 0.003024038 4.19474E-06
LP2 CR5 0.007082114 2.31135E-05
LP2 CR6 0.007082114 2.31135E-05
LP2 SD 0.009801974 2.75613E-05
LP2 CD 0.00907407 2.77268E-05
Rule 1. LB Rule
Atom1 Atom2
C6 C12 C6(lip)/C6(LB) C12(lip)/C12(LB)
LP2 O 0.00412867 5.26432E-06
1.098672611 0.972359193
LP2 OA 0.003881794 6.63207E-06
1.168546644 1.099973399
LP2 N 0.004016561 6.98756E-06
1.172095988 1.106665199
LP2 NL 0.004016561 6.98756E-06
1.172095988 1.106665199
LP2 C 0.003779043 9.09204E-06
1.220971824 1.200885214
LP2 CH1 0.008586694 4.05379E-05
1.241710785 1.242027167
LP2 CH2 0.007302453 2.82608E-05
1.245814281 1.250249232
LP2 CH3 0.007224107 2.4386E-05
1.243935254 1.246480609
LP2 CR51 0.005698494 1.85768E-05 1.24280447
1.24421536
LP2 CR61 0.005698494 1.85768E-05 1.24280447
1.24421536
LP2 CB 0.003779043 9.09204E-06
1.220971824 1.200885214
LP2 CA 0.002648798 3.99519E-06
1.141664438 1.049946084
LP2 CR5 0.005698494 1.85768E-05 1.24280447
1.24421536
LP2 CR6 0.005698494 1.85768E-05 1.24280447
1.24421536
LP2 SD 0.007935071 2.24225E-05
1.235272319 1.229179591
LP2 CD 0.007317596 2.23842E-05
1.240034275 1.238674874
Rule 2 Geometric mixing (GM) rule
Atom1 Atom2 C6 C12
C6(lip)/C6(GM) C12(lip)/C12(GM)
LP2 O 0.003641035 4.09423E-06
1.245815129 1.250251168
LP2 OA 0.003641034 5.83491E-06
1.245815687 1.250252433
LP2 N 0.003778885 6.18506E-06
1.245815856 1.250252111
LP2 NL 0.003778885 6.18506E-06
1.245815856 1.250252111
LP2 C 0.003703683 8.73304E-06
1.245815186 1.250251659
LP2 CH1 0.008558403 4.02712E-05
1.245815403 1.250252172
LP2 CH2 0.007302446 2.82607E-05
1.245815394 1.250251484
LP2 CH3 0.007213204 2.43125E-05
1.245815422 1.250251594
LP2 CR51 0.005684721 1.84871E-05 1.24581552
1.250251466
LP2 CR61 0.005684721 1.84871E-05 1.24581552
1.250251466
LP2 CB 0.003703683 8.73304E-06
1.245815186 1.250251659
LP2 CA 0.002427357 3.35512E-06
1.245815329 1.250251403
LP2 CR5 0.005684721 1.84871E-05 1.24581552
1.250251466
LP2 CR6 0.005684721 1.84871E-05 1.24581552
1.250251466
LP2 SD 0.007867916 2.20446E-05
1.245815714 1.250252199
LP2 CD 0.007283638 2.2177E-05
1.245815582 1.250251765
When I used LB rule the cross non bonded parameters were not similar to
lipid.itp. While in case of GM rule the cross parameters(c6 and c12) were
less then a factor of 1.25 as compare to lipid.itp. Can any one explain why
this factor of 1.25 is arising.
--
--
Regards
RAKESH GUPTA
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list