[gmx-users] Unusual Blow up
Nima Soltani
nima.slt at gmail.com
Wed Sep 2 03:19:30 CEST 2015
Justin Lemkul <jalemkul at ...> writes:
>
>
> On 9/1/15 9:40 AM, Nima Soltani wrote:
> > Hi everyone
> > I am simulating the interactions between a small peptide and different
> > metallic surfaces solvated in TIP3P water.
> > So far i have simulated 3 different surfaces correctly , however the last
> > surface becames unstable after nearly 2 ns of simulation.
> > I did an EM step again and reduced time step to half (i.e. 0.5 fs) however
> > it didn't work ... I've even set lincs-warnangle to its maximum value(=
> > 90), howeer it failed again . I don't have any idea how to fix it
> >
> > The surface is Polarizable by using *Drude* oscillators and i think these
> > oscillatoras are the cause of problems .
> >
> >
> > Step Time Lambda
> > 2270000 2270.00000 0.00000
> >
> > Energies (kJ/mol)
> > U-B Proper Dih. Improper Dih. CMAP Dih. LJ-14
> > 3.87510e+02 6.15054e+01 1.98057e+01 -5.57740e+01 6.96654e+01
> > Coulomb-14 LJ (SR) Disper. corr. Coulomb (SR) Coul. recip.
> > 2.93372e+03 8.97847e+04 -6.19085e+03 -7.47168e+05 2.44969e+03
> > COM Pull En. Potential Kinetic En. Total Energy Temperature
> > 1.39457e-03 -6.57708e+05 1.23026e+05 -5.34682e+05 3.09198e+02
> > Pres. DC (bar) Pressure (bar) Constr. rmsd
> > -2.03445e+02 -9.16454e+01 1.80260e-06
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > Program gmx, VERSION 5.0.5
> > Source code file:
> > /share/apps/gromacs-5.0.5/gromacs-5.0.5/src/gromacs/mdlib/constr.c, line:
> > 224
> >
> > Fatal error:
> > Too many LINCS warnings (1000)
> > If you know what you are doing you can adjust the lincs warning threshold
> > in your mdp file
> > or set the environment variable GMX_MAXCONSTRWARN to -1,
> > but normally it is better to fix the problem
> > For more information and tips for troubleshooting, please check the GROMACS
> > website at http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Errors
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > Thanks in advance for any suggestions / assistance
> >
>
> You'll have to describe in exact detail what you're doing. It's very easy to
> break a polarizable model. What are the sources of the parameters? Have
these
> parameters been validated in the context of TIP3P? This sounds like a very
> weird combination to me, to have part of the system polarizable and the
rest not.
>
> -Justin
>
Thank you dear Vitaly V. Chaban and dear Justin for your suggestions
Vitaly I am simulating these types of system for nearly a year and it was
working with 1 fs dt and it should not be the problem , Besides i need to
simulate the system for more than 320ns and it is not feasible to reduce dt
more.
Yes dear Dr. Lemkul
force field is a combination of valid and tested parameters
DOI:10.1021/ct301018m
DOI:10.1021/la402839q
The strange thing about this error is that Ag(111) surface was successfully
simulated and the result was reasonable however the same procedure for
Ag(100) leads to this error !
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list