[gmx-users] Testing gromacs on IBM POWER8
fcannini at gmail.com
Wed Sep 2 21:25:03 CEST 2015
On 27-08-2015 04:17, Mark Abraham wrote:
> I have no idea what you're trying to show with these graphs. Your vertical
> axis of time makes it looks like a 2.5 year old AMD chip is walking all
> over POWER8?
> Other points
> 1) GROMACS doesn't use configure or fortran, so don't mention that
This is part of a report in which we're testing Quantum Espresso as
well. So that's why there's configure and fortran there.
> 2) these simulations do not use lapack or blas, so don't mention that
We were not aware of this. Can you please point to benchmarks that use
blas/lapack, or how can we tell if it does or not ?
> 3) you need to clarify what a "CPU" is... core, hardware thread?
We've edited the graphics to make it more clear.
> 4) when you're using fewer cores than the whole node, then you need to
> report how you are managing thread affinity
We're setting 1 mpi process per core then n openmp threads to its
hardware threads. OpenMP's BIND_PROC and mpirun's bind-to-core.
> 5) the splines on the graphs are misleading when reporting discrete
Would it be clearer using solid bars?
> 6) you need to report times that are measured after auto-tuning completes
Should I discard the time spent before auto-tune completes?
> 7) you need to report whether you are using MPI, thread-MPI or OpenMP to
> distribute work to threads.
We only used MPI and OpenMP.
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users