[gmx-users] problem with gpu performance

[Peter Kroon]

Hi Jagannath,

AFAIK GT610's are rather slow. What you could try is using both cpu and
gpu for non-bonded interactions (-nb gpu_cpu)

Peter

On 04/09/15 15:01, jagannath mondal wrote:
> Dear Gromacs Users
>
>   I am trying to run gpu version of gromacs5.0.6 in a work-station which is
> a hexacore processor that can be multithreaded to 12. The workstation has 2
> Geforce GT  610 GPUs . I am finding the simulation using -nb gpu is
> exceedingly slower than -nb cpu ( i,e turning off gpu)
>
> I installed cuda-7.0 and using this I could install gpu version of gromacs
> 5.0.6 as follows.
>
> cmake ../ -DGMX_BUILD_OWN_FFTW=ON
> -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/home/jmondal/UTIL/GROMACS_5.0.6_gpu/
> -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER=gcc -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=g++  -DGMX_GPU=ON
> -DCUDA_TOOLKIT_ROOT_DIR=/usr/local/cuda/
>
>
> However,  the performance with gpu is very weird. If I do mdrun using
> following command:
> 1) gmx mdrun -s topol. -nb gpu -v &>log_run
>
> and then repeat the same thing by turning of gpu usage
>
> 2) gmx mdrun -s topol -nb cpu -v >& log_run
>
> using gpus, the performance drops about 3 times !! Using both the GPUs
> along with CPUs, the performance is: 1.620 ns/day
>   using only CPUs, the performance is 4.6 ns/day... usage of GPUs is
> frustratingly slowing down the performance.
>
> when using -nb gpu option, gromacs md.log correctly detects gpu and cpu as
> follows:
>
> Using 2 MPI threads
> Using 6 OpenMP threads per tMPI thread
>
> Detecting CPU SIMD instructions.
> Present hardware specification:
> Vendor: GenuineIntel
> Brand:  Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-5930K CPU @ 3.50GHz
> Family:  6  Model: 63  Stepping:  2
> Features: aes apic avx avx2 clfsh cmov cx8 cx16 f16c fma htt lahf_lm mmx
> msr nonstop_tsc pcid pclmuldq pdcm pdpe1gb popcnt pse rdrnd rdtscp sse2
> sse3 sse4.1 sse4.2 ssse3 tdt x2apic
> SIMD instructions most likely to fit this hardware: AVX2_256
> SIMD instructions selected at GROMACS compile time: AVX2_256
>
>
> 2 GPUs detected:
>   #0: NVIDIA GeForce GT 610, compute cap.: 2.1, ECC:  no, stat: compatible
>   #1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 610, compute cap.: 2.1, ECC:  no, stat: compatible
>
> 2 GPUs auto-selected for this run.
> Mapping of GPUs to the 2 PP ranks in this node: #0, #1
>
>
> However, when I look at the performance at the end of the simulation, the
> 'wait GPU nonlocal' takes awfully long time.
> I also tried few other options ( such as using only 1 gpu using gpu_id 0 ).
> Also played with ntmpi and ntomp option. But GPUs performance is
> drastically poor ( surprisingly 3 times slower than only cpu-based
> simulation),
>
> I am struggling to figure out whether it is a hardware issue or GPU-driver
> issue or whether I am not using best optimal option.
> Your suggestion will be useful in solving the issue.
> Jagannath
>
>
>    R E A L   C Y C L E   A N D   T I M E   A C C O U N T I N G
>
> On 2 MPI ranks, each using 6 OpenMP threads
>
>  Computing:          Num   Num      Call    Wall time         Giga-Cycles
>                      Ranks Threads  Count      (s)         total sum    %
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  Domain decomp.         2    6         63       0.270         11.322   0.2
>  DD comm. load          2    6         13       0.000          0.002   0.0
>  Neighbor search        2    6         63       0.311         13.062   0.2
>  Launch GPU ops.        2    6       5002       0.205          8.614   0.2
>  Comm. coord.           2    6       2438       0.239         10.016   0.2
>  Force                  2    6       2501       1.358         57.011   1.0
>  Wait + Comm. F         2    6       2501       0.404         16.954   0.3
>  PME mesh               2    6       2501       9.734        408.587   7.3
>  Wait GPU nonlocal      2    6       2501     117.798       4944.651  88.3
>  Wait GPU local         2    6       2501       0.005          0.206   0.0
>  NB X/F buffer ops.     2    6       9878       0.255         10.683   0.2
>  Write traj.            2    6          4       0.180          7.558   0.1
>  Update                 2    6       2501       0.807         33.886   0.6
>  Constraints            2    6       2501       1.216         51.025   0.9
>  Comm. energies         2    6        126       0.001          0.055   0.0
>  Rest                                           0.609         25.573   0.5
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  Total                                        133.392       5599.205 100.0