[gmx-users] Higher Density than Expected
Christopher Schlicksup
cschlick at umail.iu.edu
Mon Apr 25 23:10:03 CEST 2016
Hi, I am fairly new to simulation, and would like some input about whether
I have set up Gromacs correcly. I am using version 5.0.4 with the
CHARMM36-Jun2015 force field and the TIP3P water model. I am simulating a
35kDa protein in a dodecahedron box (-d 1.6) with 150mM NaCl plus
neutralizing ions.
I do a 200ps NVT equilibration followed by a 500ps NPT equilibration
followed by 230ps of production run where the protein is unrestrained. My
observations so far are that the density is higher than I would expect from
reading literature. I would appreciate any insight into whether I have a
problem, or if my density and pressure values look acceptable. Thanks in
advance
Here are my results from gmx energy:
*Energy minimization*
Energy Average Err.Est. RMSD Tot-Drift
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Potential -1.93229e+06 29000 77735.5 -189748
(kJ/mol)
*NVT Equilibration 200ps*
Energy Average Err.Est. RMSD Tot-Drift
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Temperature 299.9 0.099 2.59846 0.560458 (K)
*NPT Equilibration 500ps*
Energy Average Err.Est. RMSD Tot-Drift
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pressure 1.52892 1.7 81.0079 11.2974 (bar)
Density 1024.74 0.057 1.70907 -0.0499058
(kg/m^3)
Volume 1168.76 0.065 1.96293 0.0505822 (nm^3)
*Production Run 230ps*
Energy Average Err.Est. RMSD Tot-Drift
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pressure 0.450022 0.65 75.3012 0.157248 (bar)
Density 1025.4 0.048 1.39937 -0.209504
(kg/m^3)
Volume 1168.01 0.055 1.59374 0.238338 (nm^3)
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list