[gmx-users] Force field for ion-carbon interaction
maryam.kowsar at gmail.com
Thu Dec 22 07:40:46 CET 2016
Thank you Alex. Actually I used Amber since I havent found any better force
fields for nonbonded interactions in my system. It worked fine, but that
was questioned by a reviewer of my submitted paper, though I provided
On Wednesday, December 21, 2016, Alex <nedomacho at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Maryam,
> I am not really sure what "most proper" means when it comes to MD
> simulations, but I think if we're talking about vdw/electrostatics, AMBER
> and OPLS-AA are very close and have been used widely in the presence of
> things like CNTs and graphene... If there's any particular effect you are
> unable to reproduce with those ion descriptions, that is of course a
> different problem.
> Hope this helps.
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Maryam Kowsar <maryam.kowsar at gmail.com>
> > Dear all
> > What is the best and most proper force field for ions (like Na+ and Ca2+)
> > and carbon structured systems interactions? I found a few papers which
> > Amber force field. Has anyone worked with or seen any papers in this
> > regard?
> > Thanks.
> > --
> > Gromacs Users mailing list
> > * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/
> > Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
> > * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> > * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> > https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> > send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> Gromacs Users mailing list
> * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support
> /Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users