[gmx-users] [pairs] vs [exclusions]
XAvier Periole
x.periole at rug.nl
Wed Jul 13 14:49:53 CEST 2016
Hi Peter,
Wouldn’t the exclusion act on the regular LJ and pairs add a different LJ(14)?
With exclusions, do you have the regular LJ present?
XAvier.
> On 13 Jul 2016, at 13:17, Peter Kroon <p.c.kroon at rug.nl> wrote:
>
> Hi Mark (and list),
>
> thanks for the ideas.
> `gmx check -s1 with_excl.tpr -s2 no_excl.tpr` didn't tell me much,
> unfortunately:
> ...
> comparing blocka excls
> excls.nra (1944 - 1920)
> comparing groups
> ...
>
> I think this means that with_excl.tpr contains 22 more exclusions.
>
> Running gmx dump on both files shows that both list the relevant `LJC-14
> q` entries. However, with_excl.tpr also produces the appropriate exclusions.
>
> So which takes precedence? From these results I'm tempted to think the
> exclusions take precedence, otherwise they wouldn't end up in the tpr.
> Or does mdrun do something intelligent here?
>
> Peter
>
>
> On 13/07/16 12:18, Mark Abraham wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I don't know which acts first, but making a few such .tpr files and
>> (hopefully) gmx check on them should make clear what happens. Or worst case
>> gmx dump the .tpr and do a textual diff. You can probably make your life
>> easier by playing around with atoms with high indices.
>>
>> Mark
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:46 AM Peter Kroon <p.c.kroon at rug.nl> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear list,
>>>
>>> I a have a short question on topologies, and the manual is somewhat
>>> unclear.
>>> If I have a topology which defines both an exclusion between an atom
>>> pair and a specific interaction between them using the [pairs] directive
>>> (function type 2), will they then have a non-bonded interaction, or not?
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance,
>>> Peter Kroon
>>>
>>> PS.
>>> short example topology:
>>>
>>> [ moleculetype ]
>>> my_molecule 1
>>>
>>> [ atoms ]
>>> ...
>>>
>>> [ pairs ]
>>> 1 4 2 .....
>>>
>>> [ exclusions ]
>>> 1 4
>>>
>>> [ bonds ]
>>> no bond between 1 and 4
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>> --
>>> Gromacs Users mailing list
>>>
>>> * Please search the archive at
>>> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
>>> posting!
>>>
>>> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>>>
>>> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
>>> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
>>> send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>
>
> --
> Gromacs Users mailing list
>
> * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
>
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list