[gmx-users] Harmonic restraint in FEP

Alexander Alexander alexanderwien2k at gmail.com
Thu Jul 14 02:12:01 CEST 2016


Perfect explanation, I got it, thanks for that.

As I mentioned, I want to apply this harmonic restraints to avoid
conformational change in the single amino aicd while perturbation in FEP.
To do so, the pull restraints comes between pairs of atoms in amino acid,
each pair contain one reference group and one pull_group as
[reference_group --pull_group], for example
[C_alpha--O],[C_alpha--N][C_alpha--H]... [C--H],[C_alpha-C] ...,  this
makes life a bit hard as multi-referece(if possible) groups as well as
multi pull-group are required in the pull code.
So, any other easier suggestion is highly appreciated.

Thanks.
Regards,
Alex

On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:47 PM, Justin Lemkul <jalemkul at vt.edu> wrote:

>
>
> On 7/13/16 5:36 PM, Alexander Alexander wrote:
>
>> Thanks Justin for your response.
>> I have already seen read the manual and every thing is clear for me for
>> the
>> "coul-lambdas" and "vdW-lambdas"and available examples. As far as I
>> understand in FEP, when we want to get rid if something gradually for
>> example vdW or charge, then we go from 0.0 ..... to 1.0 meaning in 0.0
>> they
>> are present but in 1.0 they are absent which I think is th same for all
>> the
>> XXX-lambdas.
>>
>
> This is not correct in the general sense.  It depends entirely upon how
> you define the transformation and/or A-B transitions in the bonded terms.
> For instance:
>
> couple-lambda0 = none
> couple-lambda1 = vdw-q
>
> does the exact *opposite* of what you describe above when moving from
> lambda = 0 to lambda = 1.  The "direction" of the transformation is up to
> the user to define.
>
> So, when I want to turn on or apply or have harmonic restrain then the
>> restraint-lambdas
>> should goes from 1.0 to 0.0, however it is in contradict with some
>> examples
>> in which the harmonic restraint is going to be applied and that confuse me
>> a bit.
>>
>> In summary, I want to apply gradually harmonic restraints, so,
>> reasonably, restraint-lambdas
>> = 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 ... 0.0 ?
>>
>>
> Similarly, this depends entirely on what you set using pull-coord1-k and
> pull-coord1-kB.  If you set:
>
> pull-coord1-k = 0.0
> pull-coord1-kB = 1000.0
>
> you can turn on the restraint with restraint-lambdas = 0.0 0.2 ... 1.0
>
> or you can turn them on with
>
> pull-coord1-k = 1000.0
> pull-coord1-kB = 0.0
>
> and restraint-lambdas = 1.0 0.8 ... 0.0
>
> Whatever makes the most sense to you.
>
>
> -Justin
>
> --
> ==================================================
>
> Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
> Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow
>
> Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
> School of Pharmacy
> Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629
> University of Maryland, Baltimore
> 20 Penn St.
> Baltimore, MD 21201
>
> jalemkul at outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
> http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul
>
> ==================================================
> --
> Gromacs Users mailing list
>
> * Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> posting!
>
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>


More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users mailing list