[gmx-users] to neutralize the system

[Mark Abraham]

Hi,

So you need to choose a topology for the amino acid that is consistent with
the end states of the surface-binding process (whatever that is). This
drives the answer to the question of what methods for neutralization are
feasible.

Mark

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 12:06 PM Alexander Alexander <
alexanderwien2k at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> The final goal is to model the adsorption behavior of a heptapeptide to a
> metal surface, and meanwhile, calculation of the single amino acid(involved
> in the peptide) binding free energy into the same surface.
> Some of the residues of amino acid are charged, however, their charge would
> get cancel out (sometime) each other when they come together in the
> heptapeptide.
>
> Thanks,
> Regards,
> Alex
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Mark Abraham <mark.j.abraham at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Such an answer starts with "what are you trying to model?"
> >
> > Mark
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 11:45 AM Alexander Alexander <
> > alexanderwien2k at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > How about neutralization of these cases, a single amino acid
> > (zwitterionic
> > > form)
> > >  or a peptide in aqueous solution;
> > > I was wondering which of below methods is preferable for neutralizing
> the
> > > system?
> > > One is the introducing a counter-ion(Na or Cl for example) and the
> second
> > > one is the  protonation(or deprotonaton) the amino acid or peptide by
> > > adding or removing one Hydrogen atom, so,
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Regards,
> > > Alex
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Groenhof, Gerrit <ggroenh at gwdg.de>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > You always need to neutralise with counter-ion, rather than rely on
> the
> > > > uniform background charge that the PME method introduces if your
> system
> > > is
> > > > charged. The background charge introduces artefacts for
> non-homogeneous
> > > > systems by placing charge uniformly across the system rather than
> > inside
> > > > the higher dielectric. For further explanation and quantification of
> > the
> > > > artifact see the paper by Hub et al:
> > > > http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ct400626b
> > > >
> > > > Gerrit
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Message: 4
> > > > Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 01:00:40 +0300
> > > > From: Qasim Pars <qasimpars at gmail.com>
> > > > To: gmx-users at gromacs.org
> > > > Subject: [gmx-users] to neutralize the system
> > > > Message-ID:
> > > >         <
> > > > CAGQgkdSgAweitZmGxMj10p7HcVAzAdqnTc7evJOzPXhmyhmo5A at mail.gmail.com>
> > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> > > >
> > > > Dear gmx users,
> > > >
> > > > I am confused on below questions:
> > > >
> > > > 1) Is it necessary to neutralize a protein without ligand?  Does the
> > PME
> > > > method work with a charged protein correctly?
> > > >
> > > > 2) I have done lots of MD simulations at a charged complex structure
> > > > (protein+ligand) with the PME method using GROMACS. I haven't come
> > across
> > > > with any problems because of the charge of the system. It means that
> > the
> > > > PME method works at a charged complex system properly. In spite of
> > that,
> > > do
> > > > you think that I need to neutralize a charged complex system?
> > > >
> > > > Can anyone comment on above questions?
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Qasim Pars
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ------------------------------
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Gromacs Users mailing list
> > > >
> > > > * Please search the archive at
> > > > http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> > > > posting!
> > > >
> > > > * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> > > >
> > > > * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> > > > https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users
> or
> > > > send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> > > >
> > > > End of gromacs.org_gmx-users Digest, Vol 146, Issue 68
> > > > ******************************************************
> > > > --
> > > > Gromacs Users mailing list
> > > >
> > > > * Please search the archive at
> > > > http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> > > > posting!
> > > >
> > > > * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> > > >
> > > > * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> > > > https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users
> or
> > > > send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> > > >
> > > --
> > > Gromacs Users mailing list
> > >
> > > * Please search the archive at
> > > http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> > > posting!
> > >
> > > * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> > >
> > > * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> > > https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> > > send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> > >
> > --
> > Gromacs Users mailing list
> >
> > * Please search the archive at
> > http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> > posting!
> >
> > * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> >
> > * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> > https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> > send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> >
> --
> Gromacs Users mailing list
>
> * Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> posting!
>
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>