[gmx-users] NORMAL MODES analysis to compute specific heats
Juan José Galano Frutos
juanjogf at gmail.com
Tue Mar 21 18:10:21 CET 2017
On 3/20/17 9:34 AM, Juan José Galano Frutos wrote:
>* Hi there:
*>>* I've been googled a bit about this issue (
*>* I've not found answers to my doubts yet.
*>>* My situation is that I want to obtain specific heats (Cp) of my systems
*>* (protein solvated and neutralized) but, of course, at the Temperature and
*>* Pressure of my experiments. So, my idea here is carry out a Normal Modes
*>* analysis to extract the Hessian matrix but at least after the equilibration
*>* step of my system. I'm interested in doing it so because Cp values only
*>* make sense in relation with Temperature.
*>* My doubts come up, however, when I read through the posted discussion and I
*>* find that NM analyses apparently should be performed after minimization
*>* steps (Conjugate gradient and/or L-BFGS). Then, I would like to ask you if
*>* that is really so or if it is possible carry out this calculation after,
*>* for instance, an equilibration or a productive step in which, of course,
*>* some previous minimizations have already been performed as usual?
*>>* I've not understood also the suggestion made in one of the above referenced
*>* discussions in which David Van der Spoel recommended set all cut-offs to
*>* zero (=infinite), see below:
*>>>* You can use the g96 coordinate format instead of using the trr file
*>>* from the conjugate gradients energy minimization.
*>>* Set all cut-offs to zero (= infinite).
*>>* What's the reason for that?
*>* Where one should set to zero the cut-offs...? Just in the NM step or
*>* that is for the minimization steps?
>NMA requires that you be in an energy minimum (and hence the requirement for
>exhaustive energy minimization, well below what is normally considered adequate
>for a standard MD simulation), is typically done in vacuo (hence "infinite"
>cutoffs/no PBC) and is only valid if the fundamental modes of motion are
>harmonic. At elevated temperature (anything non-0 K) you have anharmonicity in
>many motions and the harmonic approximation fails.
Ok, now I'm more clear. Thank you very much Justin.
Juan José Galano Frutos
Department of Biochemistry and
Molecular and Cellular Biology,
Faculty of Sciences,
University of Zaragoza
Pedro Cerbuna # 12, 50009
+34 976 76 28 06
Institute for Biocomputation and
Physics of Complex Systems (BIFI)
Mariano Esquillor, Edificio I + D - 50018
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users