[gmx-users] Coulomb and vdW energies
Justin Lemkul
jalemkul at vt.edu
Sun Dec 1 13:44:49 CET 2019
On 12/1/19 5:28 AM, Shreyas Kaptan wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I would not say that it is completely unrealistic/unphysical. Especially,
> the Electrostatic part. If within two subgroups, you could show that there
> is systematic repulsive or attractive potential, that could lead to some
> hypothesis about how they interact (e.g. pushing/pulling). Of course, this
> is only true of ratios of decomposed energies that are large proportions of
> the total energy, as smaller portions might not be really
> significant indicators of strong interactions.
I would argue that such an outcome is equally likely to be an indicator
of a force field error as it is some real behavior. The problem with all
such decomposition is - there is no verifiable target data (QM or
empirical) that can tell you which is true. This is why the individual
quantities have no meaning. Total interaction energy is a quantity that
you can get from QM very easily and is therefore valid target data -
CHARMM uses this and the origins of OPLS were the same. Other force
fields do not necessarily target such information so the total
interaction energy with those models is questionable.
-Justin
--
==================================================
Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
Office: 301 Fralin Hall
Lab: 303 Engel Hall
Virginia Tech Department of Biochemistry
340 West Campus Dr.
Blacksburg, VA 24061
jalemkul at vt.edu | (540) 231-3129
http://www.thelemkullab.com
==================================================
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list