[gmx-users] Replica exchange probabilities and extend simulation
Christian Blau
blau at kth.se
Fri Jan 10 08:54:25 CET 2020
Hi Ahmed,
If you have a look into "Optimal temperature ladders in replica exchange simulations", available here:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000926140900356X
you will see that your exchange probabilities should be a bit higher. Then again, you might have to set up a lot more
simulations, which you can get around with more advanced protocols like solute tempering (REST). These methods are
implemented in PLUMED for example.
If you want further insight, I suggest using
demux.pl md.log
It's a good sign if you see single replicas walking through the whole temperature range, it's a bad sign if you see that
some replicas only stay close to a certain temperature.
Best,
Christian
On 2020-01-09 14:58, hind ahmed wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> Are these probabilities good? and how can I extend the simulation of replica-exchange?
>
> Thanks
>
> Replica exchange statistics
> Repl 14999 attempts, 7500 odd, 7499 even
> Repl average probabilities:
> Repl 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
> Repl .03 .04 .04 .04 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .02 .02 .02 .01 .02 .02 .02 .02 .02
> Repl number of exchanges:
> Repl 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
> Repl 259 263 270 330 62 57 63 58 65 67 71 74 89 87 88 103 100 103 98 98 114 93 132 127 149 111 117 126 129 124 145
> Repl average number of exchanges:
> Repl 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
> Repl .03 .04 .04 .04 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .02 .01 .02 .02 .02 .01 .02 .02 .02 .02 .02
>
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list