[gmx-users] Why density increase with increasing the cutoff length?
XAvier Periole
x.periole at rug.nl
Mon Dec 21 09:18:39 CET 2009
On Dec 21, 2009, at 9:01 AM, David van der Spoel wrote:
> On 12/21/09 8:55 AM, XAvier Periole wrote:
>>
>> Would it be all cut-offs: elect + vdW ? Or the increase is separate?
>>
>> For your info the vdW are attractive potentials at long distances so
>> an increase of cutoff would result in an increase of attraction and
>> therefore to an increase of density!
>>
>> This is one good illustration of the fact that you should not change
>> the cutoff values from the ones used for the parameterization of a
>> force field.
>
> In general I agree, however for some popular force fields like OPLS
> this is not so well-defined. Jorgensen uses different cut-offs in
> different papers.
This is rather a bad example :)) With all due respect to Jorgensen, it
does not mean
this is something to do!
>
> Using PME and dispersion correction means you are almost independent
> of the cut-off length (if they are not too short). Typically 1 nm
> and upwards will give you the same results with these settings.
>
> If you're using plain cut-offs
agreed!
> or RF you're on your own.
Then the cutoffs are defined so no problem :))
But I think we all agree on these issues: the treatment of long-range
interactions
are delicate :))
>
>
>>
>> On Dec 21, 2009, at 8:03 AM, Yanmei Song wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Users:
>>>
>>> Anyone can explain why the density of the water models increase with
>>> increase the cutoff length. I tried a couple water models in
>>> reaction-field, PME simulations.The cutoff length ranged from 0.9 to
>>> 1.5. They all show the same trend. Then there must be some reasons.
>>> Anyone can tell me why?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Yanmei Song
>>> Ph.D. Candidate
>>> Department of Chemical Engineering
>>> Arizona State University
>>> --
>>> gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
>>> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
>>> Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before
>>> posting!
>>> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
>>> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>>> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
>>
>
>
> --
> David van der Spoel, Ph.D., Professor of Biology
> Molec. Biophys. group, Dept. of Cell & Molec. Biol., Uppsala
> University.
> Box 596, 75124 Uppsala, Sweden. Phone: +46184714205. Fax: +4618511755.
> spoel at xray.bmc.uu.se spoel at gromacs.org http://folding.bmc.uu.se
> --
> gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before
> posting!
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www
> interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list