[gmx-users] run g-msd using more than one core

Xiaobin Cao xcao at lsu.edu
Wed Oct 22 21:56:57 CEST 2014


Dear GROMACS users,

I want to analyze the diffusion coefficient using g_msd. Can I run this command using more than one core, and how? I tried MPI version, but I can only use one core even I applied 16 cores on a supercomputer. 

Thanks

_____________________________________________
Xiaobin Cao
Dept of Geology & Geophysics
E235, Howe-Russell Geosciences Complex,
Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, U.S.A.

________________________________________
From: gromacs.org_gmx-users-bounces at maillist.sys.kth.se <gromacs.org_gmx-users-bounces at maillist.sys.kth.se> on behalf of gromacs.org_gmx-users-request at maillist.sys.kth.se <gromacs.org_gmx-users-request at maillist.sys.kth.se>
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2014 5:00 AM
To: gromacs.org_gmx-users at maillist.sys.kth.se
Subject: gromacs.org_gmx-users Digest, Vol 126, Issue 94

Send gromacs.org_gmx-users mailing list submissions to
        gromacs.org_gmx-users at maillist.sys.kth.se

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        gromacs.org_gmx-users-request at maillist.sys.kth.se

You can reach the person managing the list at
        gromacs.org_gmx-users-owner at maillist.sys.kth.se

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of gromacs.org_gmx-users digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Fatal error:No molecules were defined in the system
      (Nilesh Dhumal)
   2. Re: Fatal error:No molecules were defined in the system
      (Justin Lemkul)
   3. Accelerated MD (Douglas Houston)
   4. difference between Pulling and Acceleration? (Tom)
   5. Calculating intermolecular water interactions (Jackson Chief Elk)
   6. Re: Membrane simulations (lloyd riggs)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 11:29:10 -0400
From: "Nilesh Dhumal" <ndhumal at andrew.cmu.edu>
To: gmx-users at gromacs.org
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Fatal error:No molecules were defined in the
        system
Message-ID:
        <8529de0e7b39d0602ebbccda84ecbbf5.squirrel at webmail.andrew.cmu.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1

I tried to send whole file.


File is big. Can I forward to your personal email directly?



Your mail to 'gromacs.org_gmx-users' with the subject

    Re: [gmx-users] Fatal error:No molecules were defined in the
system

Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval.

The reason it is being held:

    Message body is too big: 58940 bytes with a limit of 50 KB



>
> On 10/20/14 11:19 AM, Nilesh Dhumal wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> For grompp
>>
>> grompp -f minim_hy.mdp -c cu.gro -p test.top -o 1.tpr
>>
>> I get the error" Fatal error:No molecules were defined in the system"
>>
>> Here I pasted initial part of test.top file.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ; Derived from parsing of runfiles/alat.top.orig
>> [ defaults ]
>> ; nbfunc        comb-rule       gen-pairs       fudgeLJ fudgeQQ
>>   1               3               yes             0.5     0.5
>> ; comb-rule 3 is square-root sigma, the OPLSAA version
>>
>> [ atomtypes ]
>> ; full atom descriptions are available in ffoplsaa.atp
>> ; name  bond_type    mass    charge   ptype          sigma      epsilon
>>   opls_991   Cu    29        63.54600    1.098       A    3.114e-01
>> 0.02092e+00
>>   opls_993   OA    8     15.99940    -0.665       A    3.033e-01
>> 0.401664e+00
>>   opls_994   OB    8     15.99940    -0.665       A    3.033e-01
>> 0.401664e+00
>>   opls_995   CA    6     12.0110      0.778       A    3.473e-01
>> 0.39748e+00
>>   opls_996   CB    6     12.0110     -0.092       A    3.473e-01
>> 0.39748e+00
>>   opls_997   CC    6     12.0110     -0.014       A    3.473e-01
>> 0.39748e+00
>>   opls_998   HM    1      1.0080      0.109       A    2.846e-01
>> 0.06276e+00
>>
>> [ moleculetype ]
>> ; Name            nrexcl
>>   BTC             3
>>
>> [ atoms ]
>> ;   nr       type  resnr residue  atom   cgnr     charge       mass
>> typeB
>>     chargeB      massB
>>    1    opls_993      1    BTC    OA       1    -0.665    15.99940
>>    2    opls_995      1    BTC    CA       2     0.778    12.01100
>>    3    opls_996      1    BTC    CB       3    -0.092    12.01100
>>    4    opls_997      1    BTC    CC       4    -0.014    12.01100
>>    5    opls_998      1    BTC    HM       5     0.109     1.00800
>>    6    opls_997      1    BTC    CC       6    -0.014    12.01100
>>    7    opls_998      1    BTC    HM       7     0.109     1.00800
>>    8    opls_993      1    BTC    OA       8    -0.665    15.99940
>>    9    opls_995      1    BTC    CA       9     0.778    12.01100
>>   10    opls_996      1    BTC    CB      10    -0.092    12.01100
>>   11    opls_997      1    BTC    CC      11    -0.014    12.01100
>>   12    opls_998      1    BTC    HM      12     0.109     1.00800
>>   13    opls_993      1    BTC    OA      13    -0.665    15.99940
>>   14    opls_995      1    BTC    CA      14     0.778    12.01100
>>   15    opls_996      1    BTC    CB      15    -0.092    12.01100
>>   16    opls_994      1    BTC    OB      16    -0.665    15.99940
>>   17    opls_994      1    BTC    OB      17    -0.665    15.99940
>>   18    opls_994      1    BTC    OB      18    -0.665    15.99940
>>   19    opls_993      1    BTC    OA      19    -0.665    15.99940
>>   20    opls_995      1    BTC    CA      20     0.778    12.01100
>>
>> Is there any error in .top file?
>>
>
> There is no way to tell unless you provide the full file.  Either there is
> a
> syntax error somewhere that breaks the parsing, or your [molecules]
> section is
> empty.
>
> -Justin
>
> --
> ==================================================
>
> Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
> Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow
>
> Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
> School of Pharmacy
> Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629
> University of Maryland, Baltimore
> 20 Penn St.
> Baltimore, MD 21201
>
> jalemkul at outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
> http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul
>
> ==================================================
> --
> Gromacs Users mailing list
>
> * Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> posting!
>
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send
> a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>




------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 11:31:05 -0400
From: Justin Lemkul <jalemkul at vt.edu>
To: gmx-users at gromacs.org
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Fatal error:No molecules were defined in the
        system
Message-ID: <54452AB9.5020004 at vt.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed



On 10/20/14 11:29 AM, Nilesh Dhumal wrote:
> I tried to send whole file.
>
>
> File is big. Can I forward to your personal email directly?
>

No, the proper etiquette for sending files is to post them to a file-sharing
service and provide the link to the list.

-Justin

--
==================================================

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201

jalemkul at outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul

==================================================


------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 21:33:30 +0100
From: Douglas Houston <DouglasR.Houston at ed.ac.uk>
To: gmx-users at gromacs.org
Subject: [gmx-users] Accelerated MD
Message-ID: <20141020213330.74462skwlh1q5dic at www.staffmail.ed.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes";
        format="flowed"

Hi all,

Can anyone recommend a book or (preferably) review article summarising
the various accelerated MD methods commonly used in protein/peptide
simulation these days? e.g. ABF, PLUMED, REMD, aMD etc. etc. I can
read about each individually but I could use a comprehensive but
concise comparison of their pros/cons and most popular applications.

cheers,
Doug


_____________________________________________________
Dr. Douglas R. Houston
Lecturer
Institute of Structural and Molecular Biology
Room 3.23, Michael Swann Building
King's Buildings
University of Edinburgh
Edinburgh, EH9 3JR, UK
Tel. 0131 650 7358
http://tinyurl.com/douglasrhouston



--
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.




------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 18:47:47 -0500
From: Tom <dnaafm at gmail.com>
To: gmx-users <gmx-users at gromacs.org>
Subject: [gmx-users] difference between Pulling and Acceleration?
Message-ID:
        <CAARYzz5MeZyVvPH8+R-XcbYs_oLrtv7nBYJyhKyNVv-0cpUqFw at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Dear Gromacs Developer,

In the version of 5.0 or later, Gromacs has the functionalities
of Non-equilibrium MD by assigning the group of acceleration.

I am confused what is the difference between this acceleration
and the previous functionality of Non-equilibrium Pulling.

Pulling is to pull the group center of mass.
Does NEMD/acceleration assign acceleration of each atoms (not
center of mass) inside the group, like some external field of gravity ?

Thanks a lot for the information!

Thomas


------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 18:57:20 -0600
From: Jackson Chief Elk <jchiefelk at gmail.com>
To: "gromacs.org_gmx-users at maillist.sys.kth.se"
        <gromacs.org_gmx-users at maillist.sys.kth.se>
Subject: [gmx-users] Calculating intermolecular water interactions
Message-ID: <F3317854-45EF-4D35-A2C7-877D378532A7 at gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;       charset=us-ascii

Hello,
I need to calculate the intermolecular interaction energy for water confined to a micro cavity I simulated in a biphasic water-bromobutane system.  What I need to do is calculate the interaction energies ONLY for water that is within 0.4nm from the center-of-mass of the micro-cavity.  Has anybody attempted to do this on their simulation data? I don't know where to start because g_energy does not give me what I need, and the documentation and examples of g_enemat are suboptimal.
Jackson



------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 05:40:21 +0200
From: "lloyd riggs" <lloyd.riggs at gmx.ch>
To: gmx-users at gromacs.org
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Membrane simulations
Message-ID:
        <trinity-86812485-abcc-4631-86bc-18689d40d832-1413862821775 at 3capp-gmx-bs44>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://maillist.sys.kth.se/pipermail/gromacs.org_gmx-users/attachments/20141021/d74540d2/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

--
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.


End of gromacs.org_gmx-users Digest, Vol 126, Issue 94
******************************************************


More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users mailing list