[gmx-users] An extra charge

Mark Abraham mark.j.abraham at gmail.com
Sat Jun 11 20:51:08 CEST 2016


Hi,

I don't know, but perhaps your background reading about your choice of
forcefield will prove informative about what has or has not been
parametrized or tested ;-)

Mark

On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 8:37 PM Alexander Alexander <
alexanderwien2k at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Yes, I am going to calculate the free energy of single amino acid (in their
> zwitterion form) in water.
>
> I did not get your point, you mean that neither of them can not be used for
> zwitterion form if the system is a single amino acid in water? Then how a
> single amino acid (in zwitterion form) can be treated here?
> Again, the second one works fine producing uncahrged single amino acid in
> zwitterion form.
> Thanks.
>
> Regards,
> Alex
>
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 8:20 PM, Mark Abraham <mark.j.abraham at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > The zwitterion form modifies the alpha carbon charge, so can't be used
> > together for a single amino acid in this case. We should add a check that
> > stops you running into this problem. It wasn't clear in your first post
> > that you were trying to get a topology for a single amino acid.
> >
> > Mark
> >
> > On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 7:49 PM Alexander Alexander <
> > alexanderwien2k at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks for your response Mark.
> > >
> > > To keep the zwitterions form, two below possibilities are offered for
> > > terminies:
> > >
> > >  0: NH3+
> > >  1: ZWITTERION_NH3+ (only use with zwitterions containing exactly one
> > > residue)
> > >
> > > With "0:" the "-0.110 e" charge shows up while with "1:" it goes fine,
> > but
> > > what the differences is? as stated, when there is just a single amino
> > acid
> > > in system, the second one should be chosen, and if more the first one
> > even
> > > if they are charged or uncharged.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Alex
> > >
> > > On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 7:23 PM, Mark Abraham <
> mark.j.abraham at gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Look at your topology and consider where the charges go wrong.
> Probably
> > > > your termini selections are inappropriate.
> > > >
> > > > Mark
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 7:11 PM Alexander Alexander <
> > > > alexanderwien2k at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Dear gromacs user,
> > > > >
> > > > > I am expecting to get a uncharged GRO file of the Glutamic acid by
> > > > invoking
> > > > > below command, and selecting the protonated version of it, but I do
> > not
> > > > > know why I get unexpected total charge of "-0.110 e" at the end
> when
> > I
> > > > use
> > > > > the OPLS-AA force field while the other FF's result to the expected
> > > > > uncharged one?
> > > > >
> > > > > ~> gmx pdb2gmx -f glu.pdb -o glu.gro -water tip3p -ignh -ter -glu
> > > > >
> > > > > OPLS-AA
> > > > >
> > > > > Protonated (charge 0) (GLUH)
> > > > >
> > > > > Total charge -0.110 e
> > > > >
> > > > > Any comment, please?
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Alex
> > > > > --
> > > > > Gromacs Users mailing list
> > > > >
> > > > > * Please search the archive at
> > > > > http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> > > > > posting!
> > > > >
> > > > > * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> > > > >
> > > > > * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> > > > > https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users
> > or
> > > > > send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> > > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Gromacs Users mailing list
> > > >
> > > > * Please search the archive at
> > > > http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> > > > posting!
> > > >
> > > > * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> > > >
> > > > * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> > > > https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users
> or
> > > > send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> > > >
> > > --
> > > Gromacs Users mailing list
> > >
> > > * Please search the archive at
> > > http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> > > posting!
> > >
> > > * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> > >
> > > * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> > > https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> > > send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> > >
> > --
> > Gromacs Users mailing list
> >
> > * Please search the archive at
> > http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> > posting!
> >
> > * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> >
> > * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> > https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> > send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> >
> --
> Gromacs Users mailing list
>
> * Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> posting!
>
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>


More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users mailing list