[gmx-users] topology file construction
Justin Lemkul
jalemkul at vt.edu
Sun Mar 19 15:49:01 CET 2017
On 3/19/17 10:02 AM, abhisek Mondal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using following topology configuration for the above said
> heteroatom:
>
> 1 OM 1 ANP O1G 1 -0.348 15.9994
> 2 P 1 ANP PG 1 0.971 30.9738
> 3 OM 1 ANP O2G 1 -0.348 15.9994
> 4 OM 1 ANP O3G 1 -0.348 15.9994
> 5 NL 1 ANP N3B 1 -0.275 14.0067
> 6 H 1 ANP H3B 1 0.398 1.0080
> 7 P 1 ANP PB 2 0.971 30.9738
> 8 OM 1 ANP O1B 2 -0.348 15.9994
> 9 OM 1 ANP O2B 2 -0.348 15.9994
> 10 OA 1 ANP O3A 3 -0.348 15.9994
> 11 P 1 ANP PA 3 0.971 30.9738
> 12 OM 1 ANP O1A 3 -0.348 15.9994
> 13 OM 1 ANP O2A 3 -0.348 15.9994
> 14 OA 1 ANP O5' 3 -0.348 15.9994 ;'
> 15 CH2 1 ANP C5' 4 0.000 14.0270 ;'
> 16 CH1 1 ANP C4' 4 0.000 13.0190 ;'
> 17 OA 1 ANP O4' 4 -0.348 15.9994 ;'
> 18 CH1 1 ANP C3' 5 0.000 13.0190 ;'
> 19 OA 1 ANP O3' 5 -0.348 15.9994 ;'
> 20 H 1 ANP H8L 5 0.398 1.0080
> 21 CH1 1 ANP C2' 5 0.000 13.0190 ;'
> 22 OA 1 ANP O2' 5 -0.348 15.9994 ;'
> 23 H 1 ANP H8M 5 0.398 1.0080
> 24 CH1 1 ANP C1' 5 0.000 13.0190 ;'
> 25 NR 1 ANP N9 6 -0.275 14.0067
> 26 CR1 1 ANP C8 6 -0.100 12.0110
> 27 HC 1 ANP H8 6 0.100 1.0080
> 28 NR 1 ANP N7 6 -0.275 14.0067
> 29 C 1 ANP C5 6 0.150 12.0110
> 30 C 1 ANP C4 7 0.150 12.0110
> 31 NR 1 ANP N3 7 -0.275 14.0067
> 32 CR1 1 ANP C2 7 -0.100 12.0110
> 33 HC 1 ANP H2 7 0.100 1.0080
> 34 NR 1 ANP N1 7 -0.275 14.0067
> 35 C 1 ANP C6 7 0.150 12.0110
> 36 NT 1 ANP N6 7 -0.275 14.0067
> 37 H 1 ANP H62 7 0.398 1.0080
> 38 H 1 ANP H61 7 0.398 1.0080
>
> But even after I neutralize the charge using:
>
> *grompp_mpi -f em.mdp -c solv.gro -p topol.top -o ions.tpr*
> *genion_mpi -s ions.tpr -o solv_ions.gro -p topol.top -pname NA -nname CL
> -neutral -conc 0.1*
>
> It says the following when I ran *grompp_mpi -f nvt.mdp -c em.gro -p
> topol.top -n index.ndx -o nvt.tpr* :
> NOTE 1 [file topol.top, line 10075]:
> System has non-zero total charge: -0.472999
> Total charge should normally be an integer. See
> http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Floating_Point_Arithmetic
> for discussion on how close it should be to an integer.
>
>
> Can you please help me out here ? Although the equilibration is running but
> is it alright to go with it ?
>
Is it possible for any molecule to acquire 0.472999 of an electron? Clearly the
answer is no, so the topology is badly broken and any simulation you do is
invalid. Garbage in, garbage out :)
You shouldn't try to parametrize this whole molecule at once; most force fields
already have ATP in them, and this is just a phosphoramide analog of it, so you
have most of the parameters that you need. I would also not choose GROMOS, as
it is not widely used for nucleic acid/nucleotide simulations. CHARMM or AMBER
are better choices. You need to focus on parametrizing the phosphoramide
linkage (charges and bonded parameters), not the whole thing. PRODRG isn't even
going to get you close with the dihedral parameters because there's nothing
similar in the GROMOS force field upon which to base those parameters, AFAIK.
-Justin
--
==================================================
Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201
jalemkul at outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul
==================================================
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list