[gmx-users] Getting ligand's topology

Mahdi Sobati Nezhad mahdisobatinezhad at gmail.com
Sun Aug 19 10:06:44 CEST 2018


thanks.
if I use MATCH server or swissparam, I can trust to their results?!

And this is my error when I use CGenFF:
"readmol2 warning: non-unique atoms were renamed. Now processing molecule
mae ..."

And this is my output of penalty:

* Toppar stream file generated by * CHARMM General Force Field (CGenFF)
program version 2.2.0 * For use with CGenFF version 4.0 * read rtf card
append * Topologies generated by * CHARMM General Force Field (CGenFF)
program version 2.2.0 * 36 1 ! "penalty" is the highest penalty score of
the associated parameters. ! Penalties lower than 10 indicate the analogy
is fair; penalties between 10 ! and 50 mean some basic validation is
recommended; penalties higher than ! 50 indicate poor analogy and mandate
extensive validation/optimization. RESI mae 0.000 ! param penalty= 198.400
; charge penalty= 142.287 GROUP ! CHARGE CH_PENALTY ATOM C1 CG2R61 0.227 !
0.000 ATOM C2 CG2R61 -0.117 ! 2.688 ATOM C3 CG2R61 -0.003 ! 5.191 ATOM C4
CG2R61 -0.117 ! 2.688 ATOM C5 CG2R61 0.227 ! 0.000 ATOM C6 CG2R61 0.217 !
0.000 ATOM H1 HGR61 0.115 ! 0.000 ATOM H2 HGR61 0.115 ! 0.000 ATOM O1 OG301
-0.391 ! 0.000 ATOM O2 OG301 -0.391 ! 0.000 ATOM O3 OG301 -0.391 ! 0.000
ATOM C7 CG331 -0.100 ! 0.000 ATOM H3 HGA3 0.090 ! 0.000 ATOM H4 HGA3 0.090
! 0.000 ATOM H5 HGA3 0.090 ! 0.000 ATOM C8 CG331 -0.100 ! 0.000 ATOM H6
HGA3 0.090 ! 0.000 ATOM H7 HGA3 0.090 ! 0.000 ATOM H8 HGA3 0.090 ! 0.000
ATOM C9 CG331 -0.100 ! 0.000 ATOM H9 HGA3 0.090 ! 0.000 ATOM H10 HGA3 0.090
! 0.000 ATOM H11 HGA3 0.090 ! 0.000 ATOM C10 CG3C51 0.317 ! 142.287 ATOM N1
NG3C51 -0.343 ! 101.066 ATOM C11 CG321 -0.072 ! 70.919 ATOM H12 HGA2 0.090
! 2.500 ATOM H13 HGA2 0.090 ! 2.500 ATOM C12 CG2R53 0.464 ! 90.248 ATOM N2
NG2R50 -0.515 ! 21.469 ATOM N3 NG3C51 -0.417 ! 87.522 ATOM H14 HGP1 0.341 !
3.424 ATOM C13 CG321 0.028 ! 26.713 ATOM H15 HGA2 0.090 ! 2.659 ATOM N4
NG3N1 -0.689 ! 58.305 ATOM C14 CG2R61 0.140 ! 19.097 ATOM C15 CG2R61 -0.110
! 13.488 ATOM C16 CG2R61 0.036 ! 13.718 ATOM C17 CG2R61 -0.112 ! 0.000 ATOM
H16 HGR61 0.115 ! 0.000 ATOM C18 CG2R61 0.071 ! 0.000 ATOM C19 CG2R61
-0.089 ! 0.000 ATOM H17 HGR61 0.115 ! 0.000 ATOM S SG311 -0.210 ! 105.411
ATOM H18 HGP3 0.160 ! 4.359 ATOM H19 HGR62 0.144 ! 0.000 ATOM Cl1 CLGR1
-0.152 ! 2.500 ATOM Cl2 CLGR1 -0.167 ! 0.000 ATOM HXT1 HGA1 0.090 ! 5.954
ATOM HXT2 HGA2 0.090 ! 2.659 ATOM HN HGP1 0.394 ! 9.368 ATOM LP1 LPH 0.050
! on Cl1 ATOM LP2 LPH 0.050 ! on Cl2


Thanks for your taking time


On Sat, 18 Aug 2018 22:31 RAHUL SURESH, <drrahulsuresh at gmail.com> wrote:

> I cannot assist you much with the description of your ligand. But what I
> have seen is, ring with N shows maximum penalities in most cases.
>
> When you optimise with mp2, the structure shows no much changes.
> So penalty is same most time.
>
> Try to download file from Zinc15 database which is most preferred file
>  cgenff. Still the penalty may exist in cse of N in ring. It could be
> optimised using ffTK. Again I find your structure is pretty big which will
> be time consuming. Or you have to adapt divide and conquer method, which is
> going to be complicated. So it’s your wise choice always. Maybe others,
> especially Dr. Justin or Dr. Mark could give you a better soln.
>
> Thank you
>
> On Sat, 18 Aug 2018 at 10:17 PM, Mahdi Sobati Nezhad <
> mahdisobatinezhad at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for your help.
> > my ligand is three rings that connects with a carbon and this rings have
> > Nitrogen, oxygen, sulfur, carbon and Chlor...
> > And high penaltys are just for that ring that contains Nitrogen, carbon
> and
> > sulfur
> > And so on my choice is just using ffTK?!
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 18 Aug 2018 21:05 RAHUL SURESH, <drrahulsuresh at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi.
> > >
> > > To resolve the penalties are bit complicated. Tools like ffTK can help
> > you
> > > do it. But output from ffTK is as in charmm and henceforth it take
> > > additional work ( was difficult for me ) to modify it to Gromacs
> > acceptable
> > > format.
> > >
> > > I personally don’t appreciate this method as it is very time consuming
> if
> > > your structure is big and having penalties in dihedrals which again
> make
> > it
> > > complicated.
> > > Thank you
> > >
> > > On Sat, 18 Aug 2018 at 7:02 PM, Mahdi Sobati Nezhad <
> > > mahdisobatinezhad at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi
> > > > I'm a begginer in taking ligand's topology from CGENFF and my '.str'
> > file
> > > > have some high penalty numbers. What I can do?!
> > > > And how I can do validation and optimization?!
> > > > I read the FAQ in its server but I don't understand!!!
> > > > Thanks
> > > > --
> > > > Gromacs Users mailing list
> > > >
> > > > * Please search the archive at
> > > > http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> > > > posting!
> > > >
> > > > * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> > > >
> > > > * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> > > > https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users
> or
> > > > send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> > > >
> > > --
> > > *Regards,*
> > > *Rahul *
> > > --
> > > Gromacs Users mailing list
> > >
> > > * Please search the archive at
> > > http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> > > posting!
> > >
> > > * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> > >
> > > * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> > > https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> > > send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> > --
> > Gromacs Users mailing list
> >
> > * Please search the archive at
> > http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> > posting!
> >
> > * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> >
> > * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> > https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> > send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>
> --
> *Regards,*
> *Rahul *
> --
> Gromacs Users mailing list
>
> * Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> posting!
>
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.


More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users mailing list