[gmx-users] Rupture force definition
Justin Lemkul
jalemkul at vt.edu
Fri Jan 19 13:52:50 CET 2018
On 1/19/18 12:52 AM, Rakesh Mishra wrote:
> Dear Justin
>
> Thanks for your explanation . Yes I am agree that it will depend on the k
> value and path direction.
> Let suppose we map the experimental spring constant and rate then it will
> be some how relevant for my study.
>
> My another query is the same from umbrella sampling of puling code.
> If I restrain some different molecule (let C ) and give the reference
> molecule (let B) and pulling molecule (Let A), then
> I found that , when I pull molecule A in + x direction then C has
> immobility while molecule B is feeling opposite force w. r. t. molecule
> A. i. e. if molecule A is moving
> along + x direction then reference molecule B starts to move in - x
> direction.
> Now I want to know that in pulling code, does reference molecule and
> pulling molecule connected with imaginary spring, due to this newton third
> law is applying here.
Yes, of course. The biasing potential is applied to both species
specified in the group setup; we use a convention of "pulled" and
"reference" group for defining a suitable reaction coordinate, but the
forces are always applied to any group involved in this process.
-Justin
--
==================================================
Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
Virginia Tech Department of Biochemistry
303 Engel Hall
340 West Campus Dr.
Blacksburg, VA 24061
jalemkul at vt.edu | (540) 231-3129
http://www.biochem.vt.edu/people/faculty/JustinLemkul.html
==================================================
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list