[gmx-users] Questions about position restraint for charged proteins
Koki Yokoi
kyokoi at uwm.edu
Fri May 16 23:32:45 CEST 2014
Hello. I am currently using GROMACS4.6.5 and trying to simulate a fluorescent protein(GFP,1EMB.pdb) fused to a muscarinic acetylcholine receptor(M2,3UON.pdb). PDB file of M2(3UON.pdb) included a lysozyme part(res#1002-1161), so I removed it to make the simulation consistent with our experimental data. As a result, there is a gap in M2 structure, which means M2 is divided into two chains(res#20-217, res#377-456), and when in NVT equilibration process, these chains move apart from each other because both are positively charged. I would like to keep the conformation of M2 and immobilize it in simulation to see only the motion of the fluorescent protein, so I applied position restrains to M2, but two chains still move away from each other and eventually I get many LINCS warnings during NVT equilibration process and simulation collapses.
My question is:
Position restrain is a proper way to keep conformations of proteins which have the same charge? Or is there any other way to do so?
I am using all-bonds constraint and 2fs time step to save the simulation time. Other fundamental parameters are default.
Any help would be appreciated. Thank you very much.
Koki
Below is the error messages during NVT equilibration process:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
relative constraint deviation after LINCS:
rms 0.050664, max 3.739141 (between atoms 962 and 963)
bonds that rotated more than 30 degrees:
atom 1 atom 2 angle previous, current, constraint length
962 963 89.9 0.1109 0.5118 0.1080
964 965 90.1 0.1106 0.4336 0.1111
964 966 31.9 0.1104 0.1199 0.1111
Wrote pdb files with previous and current coordinates
Step 575382, time 575.382 (ps) LINCS WARNING
relative constraint deviation after LINCS:
rms 611.466194, max 51433.625000 (between atoms 570 and 573)
bonds that rotated more than 30 degrees:
atom 1 atom 2 angle previous, current, constraint length
555 557 46.2 0.1345 0.1917 0.1345
557 558 49.3 0.0997 0.1394 0.0997
557 559 82.2 0.1430 0.4301 0.1430
559 560 78.3 0.1080 0.3101 0.1080
559 561 84.3 0.1538 1.6306 0.1538
559 574 80.8 0.1490 0.3913 0.1490
561 562 85.8 0.1111 1.4345 0.1111
561 563 85.0 0.1111 1.3860 0.1111
561 564 88.6 0.1538 7.0559 0.1538
564 565 88.3 0.1111 6.1646 0.1111
564 566 88.8 0.1538 6.5956 0.1538
564 570 145.8 0.1538 18.8304 0.1538
566 567 87.6 0.1111 1.7574 0.1111
566 568 87.6 0.1111 1.7576 0.1111
566 569 88.0 0.1111 1.7916 0.1111
570 571 90.0 0.1111 10.2121 0.1111
570 572 125.4 0.1111 10.2996 0.1111
570 573 90.0 0.1111 5714.3872 0.1111
574 575 42.6 0.1230 0.1646 0.1230
574 576 42.1 0.1345 0.1834 0.1345
916 917 33.8 0.0997 0.1182 0.0997
916 918 115.0 0.1428 2.7045 0.1430
918 919 92.6 0.1079 2.7119 0.1080
918 920 149.6 0.1533 2.6632 0.1538
920 921 36.5 0.1111 0.1355 0.1111
920 922 35.7 0.1111 0.1401 0.1111
933 934 106.0 0.1226 2.8814 0.1230
933 960 86.3 0.1372 9.0101 0.1345
935 962 121.3 0.1295 70.4373 0.1490
936 940 172.6 0.1365 9.4523 0.1400
937 955 150.4 0.1411 9.9921 0.1450
938 939 43.2 0.1241 4.6305 0.1220
938 940 79.6 0.1482 1.2946 0.1490
940 941 48.9 0.1378 3.7713 0.1360
941 942 42.8 0.1098 0.1650 0.1100
941 943 33.2 0.1444 0.2096 0.1450
955 956 73.3 0.1086 4.4738 0.1080
955 957 68.8 0.1085 3.8836 0.1080
955 958 43.4 0.1509 4.5246 0.1490
958 959 33.6 0.1226 0.1674 0.1230
958 969 36.3 0.1343 0.1844 0.1345
962 963 103.5 0.5118 19.1058 0.1080
962 964 131.9 0.1441 141.6376 0.1538
964 965 88.9 0.4336 2773.4438 0.1111
964 966 58.9 0.1199 82.5709 0.1111
964 967 55.1 0.1502 133.7226 0.1420
967 968 105.8 0.0947 47.8773 0.0960
Wrote pdb files with previous and current coordinates
WARNING: Listed nonbonded interaction between particles 557 and 564
at distance 3f which is larger than the table limit 3f nm.
This is likely either a 1,4 interaction, or a listed interaction inside
a smaller molecule you are decoupling during a free energy calculation.
Since interactions at distances beyond the table cannot be computed,
they are skipped until they are inside the table limit again. You will
only see this message once, even if it occurs for several interactions.
IMPORTANT: This should not happen in a stable simulation, so there is
probably something wrong with your system. Only change the table-extension
distance in the mdp file if you are really sure that is the reason.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list